VASCO POLICE BRUTALITY AGAINST INNOCENT PEOPLE

Naveed Sheikh's back after police torture at Vasco Police station

You all must have read in the Newspapers in Goa that four (4) persons from Vasco namely, Mr. Jafer Shaikh, Mr. Naveed Shaikh, Mr. Kasim Havaldar & Mr. Durgesh Surli have been arrested by the Vasco Police on 14^th Aug. 2014 in connection to the stolen car dealing. The whole Vasco knows that these accused are neither Criminals nor Robbers, they are the law abiding citizen of Vasco. One of the innocent accused Mr. Jafer Shaikh is the dealer of second hand Four Wheelers. He never knew that the car which they are dealing was a stolen one. The actual seller said to Jafer that the car is a dummy piece of Showroom which they are getting in a cheaper rate and asked Mr. Jafer to find out a customer. Mr. Jafer told to Mr. Naveed and he told to Mr. Kasim and Mr. Kasim told to Durgesh. 

Naveed Sheikh, the recipient of police third degree treatment at Vasco Police station

They never knew the actual seller except Mr. Jafer and they were only a mediators. Days were passed and all of them forgotten about this car deal. Finally Mr. Durgesh, an SC brought a customer to purchase the said vehicle. Mr. Durgesh pressurized Mr. Kasim and he pressurized Mr. Naveed and he pressurized Mr. Jafar for a deal. Till now these four innocent accused were not known that the car was a stolen one. The deal of Car was kept on 14^th Aug. 2014 in the evening by the purchaser. Finally Police arrested all these four innocent accused during night. Police without uniform attacked Mr. Naveed mercilessly with fits and blows. Mr. Naveed thought that the gang of Gundas might have attacked him and he tried to escape. When he was brought to the Police Station then he came to know that they were the Policemen. All these four innocent accused were brought to the Vasco Police Station to fall prey to the brutality of Police in Uniform and were mentally tortured and particular sections of IPC were robbery were forcibly imposed on them. Mr. Naveed was tortured with third degree in a Police Lock-up and he received severe injuries on his back. Wooden stick was sorcibly pushed inside his annus. Naveed was also hit on the bottom of his leg sole. He was further tormented by accusing him to be ISI agent. Now he cannot hear properly and got severe pain in his left ear. Bamon Raj wants to condemn mulnivasi muslims as ISI agents and as terrorists so that hate is generated and OBC, SC and ST are united to accept Bamon leadership.

One of the innocent accused Mr. Jafer has given the name and Telephone No. of the seller to the Police. But Police failed to trace him. The actual culprit is still at large and the innocent are harassed in a Police Lock-up. Day-by-day the crimes are getting increased in our Goa State because the Goa Police failed in arresting the real robbers - the kingpins - and instead are harassing a law abiding innocent citizen. Police Department is not bothered to curb the increased rate of crime but they are more concerned about their promotion and to receive a medals by the Department. One wonder why this same treatment is not allotted to Audooth Timblo whom Court has confirmed to have been using banned explosives for mining purpose on Hiralal Khodidas mine in Colamb, Sanguem? Why till date there is not even a criminal case registered? It is because he is a Bamon? Is not State of Goa functioning based on Manusmriti that protects Bamons?

On Monday 18^th Aug. 2014, Bharat Mukti Morcha Vasco convener Mr. M. Saleem went to see these four innocent accused, but he was not allowed to meet them, instead harassed by Investigation Officer Mr. Nikhil Palyekar saying whether he might also involved in this crime. This is the way our Policemen torture common persons to demoralize the Society. How come a law abiding citizen could believe these policemen in Uniform when they behave as goondas? As is the reason the real culprits get scot free and common people are being targeted as a Criminals. Police Department is more responsible for increase in crime. We the citizen of Goa condemn such type of Police brutality in lock-up. The family members of these accused were kept in a dark and they too were not allowed to meet their family members in lock-up. Only innocent people are the criminals in Police eye. Police should not forget that they are not the decision maker but they are only the Public Servant.  One may not be wrong that it may be the Home Minister that has got police to behave in this particular manner.

All four innocent accused were released on bail on Tuesday, 19^th Aug. 2014. Even while of their release on bail the Policemen in Uniform threatened them saying whether anywhere in Goa any kind of robbery takes place they will be brought to Police Station for torture. Now, these four accused are in a fear and panic that Police may arrest them in any time. 

We request all the citizen of Goa to stand up with the innocent people against Police Brutality. Concerned authorities are requested to take legal action against the so called Policemen to curb the barbaric acts on innocent in lock-up and make sure that such type of incident should not happen in future. And guilty police officers are punished.

What is more dangerous in this episode is that innocent people are implicated in the case, arrested  and then taken their pictures and published in market places and declared them as robbers even before the trial. further they are being additionally targeted because they are Muslim mulnivasis. If they were Muslim Bamons they would have never been implicated, arrested and defamed as robbers in Vasco market. One of the persons who carried on beating and kicking and third degree torture was a home guard who was put on duty on Thursday night. This home guard already had grudge against Naveed for refusing to salute him on taxi stand in Vasco when all other taxi drivers salutes him.

There has been systematic attempt to brand Muslims in India as terrorists and as ISI agents. In Goa too there are attempts from Bamon rulers and newspapers. Bharat Mukti Morcha had exposed this attempt by 'Goan' newpaper owned by mining company Fomentos few years ago in collaboration of the Chief Minister of Goa who is an RSS (Racial Superiority System) cadre. You may read up by clicking here.

Bharat Mukti Morcha calls for urgent Judicial investigation on the conduct of police and home guard at Vaso police station that resulted in torture of Naveed. Bharat Mukti Morcha expresses support with Naveed and his family who is currently undergoing fearful days. Minority Bamons are ruling Goa and they have turned police department as an extended arm of their agenda and self interest. Rightly so Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar set fire to Manusmriti in Mahad in 1927, December 25 and we need to set it on fire in Goa every breath of our lives.

Through violence Gandhi, Congress and Brahmins partitioned country, established their control over India

Bharat Mukti Mukti Morcha, 2^nd national convention, 26^th December 2012, Malda Town, West Bengal, Hon. Waman Meshram’s speech in session titled “Brahmins captured power through violence”. Translated from Hindi speech published in बहुजनो  का  बहुजन  भारत  of 3rd March 2013.

Brahmins even though they are minority are ruling over overwhelming majority. It is necessary to think and reflect deeply; further research it seriously. If awareness can be created on this subject and debated all over India, if opinions of experts is collected then lots of information will get accumulated. In order to destroy Indus valley civilization Brahmins adopted strategies of betrayal, cheating and varied violent means.

There are plenty of examples of violence available in Ramayana and Mahabharata. Secondly the descendent of Samrat Ashoka who was to take over the throne Bruhadrath was killed by none other than a Brahmin named Pushyamitra Sungh. This was not just an end of King but it was an end of an era. That’s why this happening is path-breaking event. This was very frightful event. The outcome of Budha’s revolution was establishment of Maurya Kingdom. This was a political effect of this revolution. Those who were declared by Brahmins as Shudras (slaves) their Kingdom got established. That why this was very big revolution, and that’s why it was path-breaking event. This path-breaking happening that we call revolution, Brahmins sought to convert into counter-revolution; that’s why Bruhadrath was killed and counter-revolution triggered off. This was path-breaking event. This was not just a killing of King as we people of mulnivasi samaj still live in the shadow of that counter-revolution. That’s why it was not an ordinary event.  Ramayana is a coded-fiction-story of Bruhadrath killing. After Bruhadrath killing was the mass killings of Bikhus. This is very big history and it is entirely history of violence. Evidence from ancient India is available that points out that Pushyamitra Sungh issued order that any one wearing yellowish clothes (followers of budhas worn yellow clothes then) found anywhere, his head is to be severed from the body and whoever does this was rewarded with gold coins. After counter-revolution Pushyamitra Sungh performed the ceremony of sacrificing horse in fire (Ashvamedh Yadhnya). Pushyamitra Sungh’s teacher was Patanjali for whom Ramdev Baba accepts as his teacher too. Ramdev is not aware that he himself is Ahir (Yadav) and Ahirs are nagavanshi people, and Nagavanshi people were slaughtered by Patanjali and his Jati people. Ramdev is calling him his teacher. It is important to understand this deficiency of history. All this is result of being ignorant of history.

If you read Mahabharata then you will realize that King of Nagvanshi people was Takshak. In order to kill him Khandav forest was set on fire. This also is an instance of violence. After that it was Shashank who was Budhist King. After Samrat Ashoka biggest King was Samrat Kanishka and he was found dead in his bed room. The meaning of Samrat is the ruler of huge territory. Samrat Kanishka was also killed. After this came King Harshavardhan, who during Kumb Mela in Allahabad had organized very big Buddist Convention.  500 Brahmin attempted to kill him by roasting in fire. In this way all these people were killed by Brahmins in large numbers. In Maharabharat it is not the story of lone King Takshak but they carried on the genocide which is called ceremony of snake sacrifice (Nag Yadhyna). Snake was a totem of mulnivasi people of India. In North India Ahir people are Brahminised into ‘’Yadavs’. ‘Ahi’ in Sanskrit means snake (Nag). The word ‘Ahir’ is derived from the word ‘Ahi’. Maurya too was Nagvanshi and Ahir too is Nagvanshi. In order to Brahmanize them they are given new identity as ‘Yadav’. After transforming them to Yadav it became possible to connect Yadav with Krishna. After connecting with Krishna connection with Mahabharat became possible. After connecting with Mahabharata it is possible to connect with Gita. After connecting with Gita it is possible to Brahmanize Yadav. And this is how Brahmanization took place. It is necessary to write the history of India in new mindset. After this saints were massacred; such as Sant Tukaram, Chakradhar and Chokhomela. These people were born in Maharastra. Kabir, Ravidas and Namdev were punished with expulsion from the country or they might have been killed too.

1857 agitation was planned entirely by Brahmins. After completion of planning, Brahmins went to Bahadur Shah Jafar who was ruling Delhi as Badshah.  Under Jafar there were number of small Kingdoms and Princely States. All of them had weapons with them. If Bahadur Shah Jafar involves all of them then it was possible to carry on armed rebellion. This is exactly what Brahmins planned and carried on their task by pushing Bahadur Shah Jafar in front. In this armed rebellion of 1857 many people were killed. After this on 9^th August 1942 Gandhi issued an order “Do or Die!” This was also violent agitation and its documents of evidence are available; there was nation wide violence at that time. It is totally wrong to claim that Freedom was earned with non-violence.

Before 9^th August 1942 Subhas Chandra Bose had broadcasted campaign “Chalo Delhi” from Singapore radio. With Azad Hind Fauz he was approaching Delhi, this was also violent agitation. Gandhi thought if Subhas Chandra Bose who according to his caste is Kaisth (Shudra) captures power over India by force then Brahmins will have to be subservient to Shudras. In order to prevent the capture of power by Subhas Chandra Bose Gandhi started violent agitation with a slogan “Do or Die!”. Gandhi achieved freedom through violence. It is very important to understand that due to violent agitation Gandhi refused to hold talks with Babasaheb Ambedkar. Gandhi refused to hold talks with Barrister Jinha and Gandhi never took any initiative to grant them their rights. As Freedom was won through violence Gandhi created terror amongst others and attempted to suppress other voices.

Violence is also one of the reasons for partition of India because of which Jinha was compelled to accept proposal of Partition of India. The ‘reason is Gandhi and effect is Jinha’. Effect is not responsible for Reason. At a time of partition nearly 10 lakh people were killed. Perhaps nowhere in the world such a big scale of genocide might have not taken place. Freedom was achieved with violence, because of violence India was partitioned and because of violence Gandhi, Brahmins and Congress were able to capture power. Through violence Brahmins and Vyashas together captured India. After that however in order to keep power exclusively with Brahmins Gandhi was assassinated and perpetuated more violence so that Vyashas will not have equal share in power in free India. In this way in order to capture India through violence Gandhi was assassinated.

Today it is with violence alone that Brahmins have kept control over power structure in India. That’s why it can be said that Brahmins have captured India through violence. Indian Constitution came in force and Universal adult suffrage got enforced. According to Universal Adult suffrage minority cannot rule over majority. Minority cannot establish their hegemony. Yet Brahmins took help of violence and in 65 years of Freedom carried on 65,000 riots in which many lakhs of muslims were killed. Besides this Brahmins carried on the Hinduization of Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and Backward jatis (OBC). This is a principle of coercion to accept Brahmin religion. Hinduisation triggered off riots. In this scenario minority Brahmins established rule over majority mulnivasis and in 65 years established rule over Indians. All this was possible only because of application of violence.

But now we have to free India from Brahmins, so what and how to do? We have ultimate option that is peaceful mass agitation that has to be non-violent. One point has to be kept in mind that through agitation we will not get freedom but with mass agitation. Mass agitation means one objective but participation of many crores of people. If we - in this way - peacefully carry on the mass agitation then we may be able to peacefully dislodge Brahmins who have captured power violently. This is an option before us. Agitation will be non-violent but it will be mass agitation; then we will succeed in peaceful manner. Or there is no way of succeeding in violent agitation. If Brahmins are not able to understand Peaceful manner of agitation and if any event takes place in future that signals that Brahmins are incapable to understand Peaceful agitation then alternate method of agitation to be adopted will be decided then. Right now this is not the situation in before us. If we connect crores of people in mass agitation then definitely we will succeed in achieving our objective. That’s why you have to do only one task, search one new person daily and explain to him. In order to awaken people you have to get out of the house. After preparing new person tell him also to prepare any one person per day. In this way if you prepare second person, second person prepares third person, third person prepare fourth person, if this task is carried out by people in all the States, people all over India, people of District, Tehsil, Block and in very village simultaneously we will succeed and that too quickly. If 6.5 lakh village people do this simultaneously then we will be able to set our captive society free. That’s why in order to prepare yourselves and your people, and organize people, to motivate people for participation in mass agitation, get yourself trained and be alert. With this hope National President ended his speech.

Mohammad Saleem appointed Convenor of Bharat Mukti Morcha for Vasco-da-Gama city

Mohammad Saleem is appointed as a convener of Bharat Mukti Morcha Vasco-da-Gama city unit in Marmagoa Taluka. He is a science graduate and connected with Bharat Mukti Morcha activities across the State of Goa. Mohammad Saleem's involvement with Bharat Mukti Morcha increased and intensified after Fomento  owned weekly 'The Goan' tagged muslims living in Goa as 'Terrorists' in its August 11, 2012 issue. Bharat Mukti Morcha then went on offensive against this Fomento attack on Muslims in Goa with its public statement. Bharat Mukti Morcha is happy to delegate this important responsibility of spreading our Mulnivasi freedom struggle in Goa's Port Town of Vasco to Mohammad Saleem.

Part 3 : Revolution and counter revolution in modern India

 Waman Meshram, National President, Bharat Mukti Morcha

Burning problem of our times 

Babasaheb Dr. Ambedkar had begun writing ‘Revolution and Counter Revolution in ancient India’ but few episodes Babasaheb could not complete. From this book we can get lots of stuff to know and understand our present. Today we are told that the biggest problem of our present is the ‘Hindu-Muslim’ problem. This problem was existing even in the freedom struggle, this problem created Pakistan and even after creation of Pakistan this problem has persisted.

If it is accepted that Hindu-Muslim problem is the biggest problem then from the perspective of Hindu-Muslim problem, if attempt is made to know and understand India’s history then it can be said that when Muslims came to India from that time onwards the problem of Hindu-Muslim is existing in India. When there were no Muslims in India then what was the problem? I don’t think that our people are reflecting on this.

When Muslims were not there in India then what was the biggest problem? And if there was some other problem then what happened to it? Is it flown in the air? Is that problem ended? Or is it the case that the people, who tell that Hindu-Muslim problem is the biggest problem, are they keeping it suppressed? This is because the solution to the problem will take place later, first it needs to be put up for discussion.

Is Hindu-Muslim problem a biggest problem? By making this question an epicenter is it not that with the intention that solution to this problem should not come, they are not allowing even a discussion to take place on it? Is it not that in order to cover up this issue they are presenting before us something else all together deliberately? I believe that by telling that Hindu-Muslim problem is a biggest problem, the people who make us to view from the perspective of ‘Hindu-Muslim problem’ are preventing the issue of Varna system, Jati system, and untouchability to come in the domain of public debate. This is so because by getting this issue in the domain of public debate is leading to danger.

The people who do not want to solve this problem do not allow this problem to be discussed publicly. And that’s why they are saying that Hindu-Muslim problem is the biggest problem attempted to create present system, or are attempting. People involved in Phule-Shahu-Dr.Ambedkar movement must remain on maximum alert who call themselves socialists, egalitarian writers. Inside them there is Brahmin historian, these Brahmin historians also go about by taking the same line. We have to be alert from the rascals going ahead in this line.

Part 19: Burning problem of Mulnivasi Muslims

Waman Meshram, National President, Bharat Mukti Morcha, 2009 Speech

Who demolished Babri Masjid?

Kalyan Singh is from (Lodi) OBC, Uma Bharati is from (Lodi) OBC, Vasudhara Raje Scindia is from (Kurmi) OBC, Narendra Modi is from (Teli) OBC. Brahmins use these people as per their convenience. It is matter of pride that when Kalyan Singh was Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh P.V.Narasimha Rao was a Prime Minister in Delhi. Supreme Court sent a Magistrate named Dayashankar to Ayodhya. Government did not sent him.  Dayashankar gave report to the government that process of demolishing Babri Masjid began from 12 pm. This message was also sent to Prime Minister P.V.Narasimha Rao. T.V was announcing the program of demolishing Babri Masjid. Narasimha Rao shut all his telephones till 6 in the evening. There was no information till 6 pm. When in the evening Narasimha Rao got the information that Babri Masjid is completely demolished and in its place temporary Ram temple has been constructed, after getting this information Narasimha Rao convened Cabinet meeting. Till then he allowed kar sevaks to demolish Masjid. He gave also opportunity to construct temple. That time Dr. C.K.Jaffer Shariff was a central railway minister.  Without informing Jaffer Shariff, Narasimha directly ordered railway board to sent as many trains possible to Ayodhya and respectfully reach all kar sevak back to their villages. What was surprising was that railway minister was unaware that Narasimha Rao has issued this order to Railway board. I have been asked as to who demolished Babri Masjid? I maintain that P.V.Narasimha Rao demolished Babri Masjid. Our people are not aware as to how much rights have been granted to Prime Minister by Indian Constitution. If required Prime Minister can convene the Cabinet meeting within half an hour and invoke article 356 in that State and remove Kalyan Singh from the position of Chief Minister. With one phone call he could have ordered President’s rule and what is important is that there is even military camp in Ayodhya. Paramilitary forces had prior deployment over there. In spite of all these conveniences Narasimha Rao did not take any satisfactory step, all this history is there in front of us.

Who triggered Godhra killings? Who sent military there?

RSS, VHP, and BJP people triggered riots in Godhra and these riots they carried on in order to win the elections.  When election program got declared, Narendra Modi became the Avatar (incarnation) of Hindus. That’s why Congress deployed Shankar Singh Vaghela in ground.  Shankar Singh Vaghela became second Avatar (incarnation) of Hindus. Congress also played the same game that BJP plays. The method that RSS used same method Congress used  to contest elections in Gujarat and attempted to demonstrate through elections that if RSS, VHP, BJP are supporters of Hindus then we are not too far in this. We are also supporters of Hindus. It is now a history that on the one side RSS, VHP and BJP, and on the other side Congress; these two people with internal understanding played this entire game in which Muslims were slaughtered. That time Gujarat had Narendra Modi government. That time Congress at the centre was demanding desolation of Modi government. Today there is Congres government at centre so why it is not dissolving Modi government? This is because all the game is played in co-ordination with each other.

Maulana Azad is a point of respect of India, similarly he is also point of respect of Congress, that’s why we have to express our gratitude to Congress.

 Congress party till date believe Maulana Azad as point of respect because Maulana Azad served Congress all his life. In return to this service he is believed as point of respect. Bu what is beyond this? There is nothing beyond this. At a time of India partition Mountbatten sent a message to Gandhi calling him to meet. Gandhiji knew that Mountbatten is calling him in order to discuss the issue of partition of India. Leaving Gandhiji aside Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel, Dr.Rajendra Prasad had already declared they support partition. But Gandhiji was against partition of India. That’s why Gandhiji asked Maulana Azad ‘if I oppose partition of India then whom will you support?’ Maulana Azad said ‘Gandhiji, if you oppose partition of India then I will support you.’

After taking assurance of support Gandhiji went to meet Mountbatten. When he returned from the meeting Gandhiji was became a supporter of  Pakistan. What is the meaning of support from Maulana Azad? In those things where their interest is involved if Muslims support then it is okay otherwise if they do not support then they leave them in air. They know that finally they go then where will they go? If they wander for long here and there then riots are organized. That’s why Muslims again get trapped in their web. This entire game is on. Mulnivasi bhahujan samaj must be aware and understand this game properly.

Part 18: Burning Problem of Mulnivasi Muslims

Waman Meshram, National President, Bharat Mukti Morcha, 2009 Speech

Gandhiji was assassinated, Nathuram Godse was circumcised, After assassination Muslims will be blamed and violence will get generated, who planning was it?

Some people think that we are giving clean chit to BJP. Perhaps some people think that we are giving clean chit to RSS, VHP people. We are well aware that RSS, VHP, BJP, Shiv Sena people are top grade badmash (rascals) and mostly Muslims know that these people are badmash (rascals). That’s why Muslims were not able to get trapped in BJP trap. When they did not get trapped in BJP web then there is no need for break them from BJP. Muslims are trapped in Congress web and that’s why Muslims will have been pulled out of Congress trap. In order to pull out there is no reason to attack BJP. This is so because if Muslims are not trapped in BJP web then what is the reason to attack BJP? Actually there is a need to attack Congress. Because Congress is betraying Muslims and Muslims do not have even a slightest realization. That’s why before everyone Congress will have to be attacked first and then Muslims will be liberated. If Muslims are to be connected then first of all they will have to be disconnected. Because where will we connect with Muslims? Muslims has prior connections. Muslims are connected with Congress Party. That’s why he will not be connected to you. There is nothing left to get connected. That’s why where they are connected they will have to disconnected, first they will have to disconnected then connected. This is politics. Our lower ranked mulnivasi Bhahujan samaj people will not be able to understand this so easily. There is no doubt that RSS, BJP, VHP people are badmash (rascals) BJP and Congress both are snakes but Congress snake is invisible. Congress is a hidden enemy and RSS an open enemy. Hidden enemy is more dangerous than open enemy. This is so because we understand his as our friend and as soon as he gets an opportunity he bites us. After biting he hides again. Invisible snakes are hidden enemies and hidden enemies are more dangerous and deadlier than open enemy. Congress is the biggest enemy of Muslims. If Muslim brothers want to protect themselves from this hidden enemy then they will have to search out the way of defence and have to gather similar pained people. Muslim is troubled from Brahmins and those who are not converted like shudras, ati-shudras are also victims of Brahmanism that’s why it is possible for both these people to form a front. Truly this will be common front. The front that is formed in Delhi is of Common Minimum betrayal front. Nothing will happen from this.  One natural common front has to be formed. Elections will take place every five years. After two to three years elections will take place. That’s why people must be thinking that now so early what the need to do anything is? So you will not be able to formulate any long term program. If you are not going to make any long term program then in future you will not be saved. If you start working on long term program then in the next 20 years your alternative will be ready. If you do not implement from today then for the next 50 years you will have no alternative ready. There will be no option left in future. In a situation without alternative enemy will hunt you down.

Part 17: Burning problem of Mulnivasi Muslims

 Waman Meshram, National President, Bharat Mukti Morcha, 2009 speech

Who made Barrister Antulay Chief Minister?

Instead of discussing amongst us let us ask Antulay Sahab as to who made you the Chief Minister? Then let us see as to what answer Antulay gives. In private Antulay fires bad words at Congress. This is so because what is truth will stand out clearly. What is special is that that time Abdul Rehman Antulay had got the in great difficulty because that time had spread the rumors that he is going to join another party. Because Antulay should not leave Congress and join another party he was given Congress party ticket. Otherwise Congress people have shown Abdul Rehman Antulay a dustbin. If Congress people made Antulay Chief Minister then you have to ask such question as to who were the Mahatmas that were trying to snatch Antulay’s chair of Chief Minister. What are the names of those Mahatmas. Were those people were from outside Congress party? Antulay’s corruption evidence documents were released to media, who are the people from Antulay’s cabinet that released these documents to media? These Mahatma people were from Congress.

1200 riots took place in Congress ruled states, who did it?

In Uttar Pradesh there is Mulayam Singh government, and there is not a single riot, In Bihar for the past 15 years there was government of Lalu Prasad Yadav, there was not a single riot. Before Lalu Prasad Yadav Government came about there was Congress government. That time how many riots took place whole world knows. Not small-small riots but very big riots took place. Then the question arises there was congress government there and in Congress government riots are taking place.  By being the government in power Congress should have fulfilled the task of protecting Muslims but Congress did not fulfill its task. Task of protection cannot be done by outside people; it should have been done by government. There was Congress government but it did not do the job.

During Mulayam Singh government in Uttar Pradesh there was not a single riot there. During the rule of Lalu Prasad Yadav too there was not a single riot in Bihar. Why there were no riots in these people’s governments? What there are riots only under Congress rule? There should have been no riots but they did take place, this is history. When government is of Congress then Congress says that those responsible for riots are people from Shiv Sena, BJP, Vishwa Hindu Parishad, RSS. Who banned RSS? Congress banned RSS. Who banned Vishwa Hindu Parishad? Congress did it. Who engineered secret discussions in Court? Congress did. Congress entered into secret compromises with Vishwa Hindu Parishad and RSS, and after banning these organizations twice lifted the bans. The motive behind behind imposing ban on these organizations was to make Muslims happy. And not only this in post-riot period as soon as situation was under control was ban revoked. Bans are revoked when Peace returns and Ban is imposed when the situation is hot. Till what how many proof did Congress presented to the Court against RSS and Vishwa Hindu Parishad? Do anyone knows anything about this? Why did secret discussion organized in Court? Why did discussion were not held publicly? This is because those who are badmash (rascals) talk to each other in darkness and live in harmony with each other. In 1932 RSS had published one book. In that book it was written that till RSS does not become strong RSS will continue to support Congress. The second meaning of this is that if RSS will continue to support Congress then in return Congress too will help in making RSS strong. Today if RSS, Vishwa Hindu Parishad, BJP are able to build such huge organizations, did they succeed in building the organizations without this co-operation? When Atal Behari Vajpayee became Member of Parliament for the first time and gave his speech in Hindi that time Jawaharlal Nehru was a Prime Minister. Nehru got up from his seat and went to Atal Behari Vajpayee and put his hand around his back and said that this man may become Prime Minister in future. If Atal Behari Vajpayee can become Prime Minister then why do Congress people give bad words to BJP? Badmash (Rascals) people of Congress speak two-two things at the same time. We are not able to understand this politics. We have to understand these things clearly. Under the Congress rule 1200 riots took place yet Congress did not carried on the task of protecting Muslims.

When Narayandutt Tiwari was a Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh then Narayandatt Tiwari promoted one Brahmin named Shrichand Dixit as Director-General of Police. For many months there was curfew in Aligarh. Shrichand Dixit was Director-General of Police. On the day he retired in the evening he joined Vishwa Hindu Parishad and as soon as he joined Vishwa Hindu Parishad in the evening he was made all India vice-president of Vishwa Hindu Parishad. What does this mean? This means that when Shrichand Dixit was working in Police department he secretly kept helping Vishwa Hindu Parishad. Is Narayandutt Tiwari not aware of this? And if he was not aware then why did Congress made such a nalayak (inefficient) person the Chief Minister? But this is not the issue. Tiwari was aware of everything but they are internally in nexus with each other and co-ordinate with each other.  They share responsibility of internal dialogues with each other. In drama this will be my role, you play that role. You play villain, I will support you. I cannot come in front. Why? It is so because it is my compulsion. Because I have to win Muslim votes and that’s why I cannot come in front yet I will assist you. In this way both these have carried on this game in the country.

What is special is that if riots took place in Congress rule they why did congress did not jail those responsible for riots? If RSS, VHP, BJP, Shiv Sena created riots then why Congress did not file case against them in Court? Congress did not do this because if it had to file the case then next time from where the manpower will come to carry on the riots? From where, men will come? Imagine Congress imprisons VHP, BJP, Shiv Sena people, then from where people will come to carry on the riots? If men are not available then Congress cannot carry on the riots. If Congress is not able to organize riots then there will be no create fear in the hearts of Muslims. If Muslims does not have fear in their hearts then they will not vote blindly to Congress. If Muslims do not vote for Congress blindly then it will not attain power in Delhi. This type of nude play is on. This nude play is dangerous conspiracy against Humanity. All this stigmatized game only Congress party plays and our mulnivasi brothers are not involved in this.

In spite of there being rule of Congress party why it did not the work of protecting Muslims from riots? This is because if Congress had to protect Muslims from riots then Muslims would have become strong. If Muslims becomes strong then tomorrow they will challenge and tomorrow if they become capable of throwing challenge then they will create a difficulty, Congress has these fears and that’s why Congress never tried to protect Muslims.

When riots took place in Gujarat then Congress people only gave statements. That time Congress party was ruling in 14 States and Congress did set even one relief camp in Gujarat. The question arises as to why Congress did not set up even a single relief camp? Congress did set up even a single relief camp because if Congress had to set up even one relief camp then BJP would have propagated that Congress is engaged in appeasement of Muslims, they are protectors of Muslims. If BJP had to campaign that Congress is a protector of Muslims then all the Hindus would have gone against Congress. In this way Congress would have been wiped off. In order to prevent this from happening Congress did not set up even a single relief camp. ‘We are not going to get a vote that’s why we are not going to do this humanitarian work’, this was a stand of Congress. What is more important: Humanitarianism or Votes? There is a need to understand these things in proper way.

Part 16: Burning Problem of mulnivasi Muslims

Waman Meshram, National President, Bharat Mukti Morcha, 2009 Speech

First Maharashtra State Mulnivasi Muslim convention took place in Sangli city. During this convention National President of BAMCEF Hon. Waman Meshram delivered his speech. Congress corporator of Sangli reacted to the points raised by Waman Meshram and raised very important question from the point of view of agitation. Waman Meshram publicly replied to this question. This replied is published here so that mulnivasi bhahujan samaj does not fall prey to the Brahmanical mindset.

Dr. Jakir Hussain, Dr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, Dr. A.P.J.Abdul Kalam Sabab rose to become Presidents of India, who made them Presidents of India?

Hon. Rajan Pilade (Congress Corporator) who has asked me this question I am thankful for him from my heart. Hon.Pilade is our own Mulnivasi brother but is trapped in Congress web.  If I am able to get him out of Congress web or make his think on this lines then I will be very happy. From the question of Hon. Pilade it is known as to how congress leaders brainwash Bhahujan Samaj. This is a best example of how Congress has brainwashed our people. That’s why this is not just the question only of Hon. Pilade but is a question of everyone who is brainwashed. We get to learn lots of lessons from this question. I am not answering this question just because it is asked by any special person but because it is a representative question, from these questions our mulnivasi Muslim brothers can learn a lesson, that’s why I believe it is important to answer this question.

The question is as to who made Dr. Jakir Hussain, Dr. Fakruddin Ali Ahmed, Dr. A.P.J.Abdul Kalam Presidents of India? The one who raised this question as well I know that these people were made Presidents of India by Congress. If these people are made Presidents of India by congress then how can Congress be anti-muslims? Basically this is a basic question that he wants to ask. What is an illusion in this question? The illusion in this question is that if Congress put Muslims in high positions then how can Congress be anti-muslims?

In this question there is a hidden emotion. This feeling is that Congress has put Muslims in such a high positions that’s why Congress had done favor to Muslims. One important question arises that Congress says that we have made Muslims Presidents of India, but I am saying that Muslim made Jawaharlal Nehru Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi made Prime Ministers of India. Muslim blindly voted for Congress.

If Muslim are not to blindly vote for Congress then would Congress would have come to Power in Delhi? Delhi’s seat of power is very far, Congress cannot get their even corporator elected without votes from Muslims. What happened in Uttar Pradesh? What happened in Bihar? Uttar Pradesh and Bihar Muslims did not vote for Congress party. Look at the plight of Congress wherever Muslims did not vote for it. In those places Congress situation is very bad. From available evidence it is clear that based on their votes Muslims bring Congress to power and after coming to power what Congress does to Muslims in return? Out of 12 crore Muslim Congress chooses just one person and makes that one person President of India. What do Congress does about 11 crore 99 lakh 99 thousaand 999 Muslims? Out of 12 crore people congress chooses only one person makes him the President of India and says to remaining 11 crore 99 lakh 99 thousand 999 muslims that we have made one of your persons President of India and what else you want? Is there any post greater than this? It make one person President of India and forgets the rest. This is a history. If Muslim population is accepted as 12 crore then from 1950 to 2004 as many elections too place to State Assemblies and Parliament, it can be said from available documents if 12 crore Muslims were allotted 12% tickets then Congress people must produce evidence to this effect. From Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi can any of them produce documentary evidence? If in the elections 3% Brahmins are given 60% tickets then 12% Muslims must be allocated minimum 12% tickets, but it ever happened this way?

All over the Country Congress party is tattered state, and our people do not know as to who is responsible for this but Congress party people knows very well that for this BAMCEF is responsible. Why? This is so because if BAMCEF had not to launch nationwide awakening program then Congress party leaders would have continued to live in illusion that some people of Bhahujan Samaj are in their right pocket and remaining people are in their left pocket. Congress would have thought that these people do not have any other alternative other than to vote for us and would have said there is no need to do anything for these people. There is no need to enforce any program of development for this purpose. BAMCEF carried on large scale peoples’ awakening program that’s why Congress situation is so bad. Out of 543 seats Congress party got 143 seats. This means Congress does not have mandate to rule over India. And that’s why Congress was forced to compromise with Communists. Which compromise? The name of that compromise is Common minimum program. Congress always gives slogans of secularism but it is not prepared to grant constitutional rights to Muslims. That’s why the Congress talks of favoring Muslims do not have any basis. Muslim first favored Congress and Congress should have paid back Muslims for their favors but it did not pay debts. Instead of paying back favor with favor Congress betrayed Muslim.

Part 15: Burning Problem of mulnivasi Muslims

Waman Meshram, National President, Bharat Mukti Morcha, 2009 Speech

Remedy of foiling Brahmani game

If we want to foil Brahmanical play then its mature remedy is that you explain understandingly to Muslims that you are converted from SC/ST/OBC communities. And those who are SC/ST/OBC people go and explain to them that Muslims are converted from SC/ST/OBC communities only. By doing this, both will come to know about their history. When they will know history brotherhood will develop amongst both of them. When brotherhood will evolve then they will both understand that they are mulnivasis of this country. When brotherhood will settle in then no Brahmin will succeed in creating riots amongst themselves. There is a very important ideal in medical sciences ‘prevention is better than cure.’ In this way we must prevent riots from occurring. If there are no riots then what is the need to call out the Army? And even if the Army is called out then what is the guarantee of your safety? That’s why if you want to find the solution to the problem then you got to campaign amongst both the parties that Muslims are basically converted from SC/ST/OBC communities. By doing this there will be no effect on Islam religion of Muslims. There will be no impact on their belief and faith. Only one effect will take place: riots will stop permanently. If, this is implemented by both the people then this problem will end soon.  That’s why we have to create make both the communities that both of you’ll are brothers. By doing this they will never be possible to be used. And what Brahmins call India’s biggest problem, it will end. Alongside Varna-Jati-Untouchabilty problem will come on the agenda and after coming on the agenda destruction of Brahmanism becomes possible.

Assam riots are bamani revenge against Babasaheb Dr. Ambedkar’s election to Constitutional Assembly

In Assam’s Kochchrajar region 9 lakh people have been seriously injured in a violence that flared up during past few weeks. Due to the incidents of burnings and rioting in the rural areas police firing took place and curfew has been imposed for indefinite period. 

The violence that spread in Assam is not religious but it a clash between local residents versus Bangladeshis. This clash is between local tribal community and Namo Shudrai jati people that has migrated from Bangaldesh into Assam. The dispute between these communities has not erupted on its own but sparked by Bamani media by giving tag of Bangladeshi intruders to Namo Shudrai jati people. Out of three crore people in Assam 81 lakh people are of Namo Shudrai jati. They have been staying in Assam for past many years and use time, job, agriculture, land, forests in Assam. They have their own organization and also their own Political Party. In all this their only mistake is that they supported Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar in getting elected to the Constitutional Assembly. Due to this they are made to suffer the revenge of the bamani system.

Bangladeshis have not entered Assam today.  Today they are opposed very strongly. This is an attempt to ensure that Adivasis and Namo Shudrai people do not unite against Bamani system. This is an attempt to set off between these two groups thereby strengthen their oppressive Bamani system. This is a conspiracy to keep Assam question burning. This must be thought over by the tribes in Assam and Namo Shudrai communities in Assam and solve this dispute mutually amongst themselves.

Riots increased after Gandhi and Home Minister Sushilkular Shinde visited Assam. Assam Chief Minister too has accused Central government of flaring up riots.