Friday 11 December 2020

Goa Declaration on World Fisheries Day 2020

All over the Globe November 21 is observed as World Fisheries Day. It was on this day in 1997 two of the fisher leaders of India - late Harekrishna Debnath and late Fr. Thomas Kochery - convened international meeting of the fisher leaders in various countries in the World at New Delhi and formed World organisation of fishers. It was then decided to mark  November 21 as World Fisheries Day. Ever since popularity of this day has increased many folds with increased focused organisation of programs in various countries involving small scale fishers who are also traditional fishers. Later the United Nations Organisations (UNO) too accepted and declared November 21 as World Fisheries Day. Several Nation-States then began to observe this day as World Fisheries Day.

Goa has been very important place known for intensity of the fishing community movement from the 1970s onwards combating trawlers. We acknowledge tremendous historical contribution from late Mathany Saldanha and others to stand up for fishers and organisationally defend fishing community interest through consistency over long period of time for over four decades. 

All Goa Small Scale Responsible Fisheries Union (AGSSRFU) affiliated to National Platform of small scale fish workers (NPSSFW) observed World Fisheries Day with reflective sessions on fishing related issues in Goa. 

All the delegates expressed on the subject of fishing and various problems confronting Fisheries.

The inputs of World Fisheries Day Celebrations at Nauxim, Goa are added to this declaration to reflect macro scenario of Fisheries in Goa from fishers point of view.

1. Marina proposed at Nauxim is disastrous for fisheries activities and we firmly oppose the same. Fishing in Zuari river will be stopped and the livelihood options of the fishing communities will come under severe threat. MPT Jurisdiction over Zuari river must be revoked. India's Ministry of Shipping has been aggressive in destroying Goa's fisheries and Goa government is silent on this. We call upon massive public engagement at all levels to protect and promote sustainability in Goa's fishery.

2. We are duty bounty to protect Goa and its ecology from all the vested interests trying to destroy.  We pledge to exercise our duty as bestowed on us by God, by SSF guideline, by Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and by Constitution of India Aticle 51-A(g). We call for setting up of Fisheries defence study group involving fishing communities, civil society and incivil society towards Stewardship of rivers and Arabian Sea. Civil society is composed of those who claim that the earth belong to them and they have rights. Incivil society is composed of those who claim that they belong to earth and they have duty of Stewardship given by God the creator.

3. Zuari river is depository of unique "Mendio" which is also Goa cultural heritage beside ecologically important specie. Zuari river being fish breeding site we pledge to defend it along with all other rivers and Arabian Sea coast.

4. Overfishing has caused depletion of fish stock in various parts of the world. We pledge to actively oppose use of destructive fishing gears such as trawling and purse seine fishing nets in legally demarcated zones and critically examine beyond.

5. We strongly oppose sagarmala project for its catastrophic potential for Fisheries in Goa. Goa's six rivers - Chapora, Moira/Mapusa, Mandovi, Cumbharjua, Zuari and Sal -are declared as National Waterways without consulting fishing communities in Goa. 

6. Marmugao Port Trust (MPT) is fraudulently brought under Major Ports Act claiming authority over 50% of Goa's coastline without consulting fishing communities and other people of Goa.

7. MPT has reclaimed 5,70,000 square meters of Zuari river through an illegal act to facilitate expansion of berthing at MPT. We pledge to actively oppose Coal lobby, Mining lobby, Tourism lobby, Shipping lobby and Gambling lobby to disrupt Goa's fisheries that is a State subject under Constitution of India. We call upon State government to actively defend Goa's fishing interests from Central government projects detrimental to Fisheries in Goa. These projects includes Marinas, Declaration of Goa's rivers as National Waterways, Dredging of rivers, MPT under Major Ports Act, Double Tracking of railways to handle coal at MPT, Port expansion, Jetty construction plans and destruction of Western Ghats forest at Mollem Wildlife Sanctuary by chopping down over one lakh trees.

8. We call upon the Fisheries department to initiate dialogue with fishing communities under pressure from various lobbies and even from the Fisheries department support to vested interests and harassing fishers with regard to subsidies withheld from 2017. We call upon Fisheries department to stop current practices of corruption that has allowed water sports by Aqua Sail to disrupt fishing activities in Zuari river due political pressures. 

9.  We call upon the students and educational institutions to interact with fishing communities in Goa in order to understand interconnections and build alliances for generating sensitivity and empathy to defend Goa's fisheries. Intra institutional and inter-institurional collaborations must be fostered.

10. We note with concern general apathy towards challenges faced by fishing communities from consumers of fish. We call upon alliance of strategy between fish consumers and fishing communities for food security and sustainability. 

11. We understand prevailing gender gap between Fishermen and Fisherwomen. While men take active part in political discussions women are absent from decision making. This is particularly so in case of women who sell fish and are known as fish vendors. Shortage in efforts to form and strength organisation of women fish workers must be addressed and for this we seek collaboration. 

12. We pledge to reach out to all the fishing communities in Goa and initiate dialogue with aim towards expanding defense network for Fisheries and our Union. 

13. We note with concern that sewage and garbage from numerous outlets is finding it's way in the rivers and then into Arabian Sea. This has affected marine life as well as quality of fish catch. Further it is further alarming to note the presence of coal inside river and contents like mercury finding it's way into oysters and other bivalves. This is very disturbing trend and coal handling at MPT must be stopped to avoid pollution of rivers in Goa. We call for urgent public scrutiny on the aspect of health of rivers and Arabian Sea under threat from MPT as well as other sources.

14. We call upon institutions of higher learning to make sufficient budgetary provisions to set up inter-disciplinary studies program in collaboration with fishing communities organizations to promote holistic system approaches to Fisheries.

15. We recognise that both legal as well as illegal sand mining on river beds in Goa is destructive to both fishing as well as marine ecology due to the kind of technology used for extraction. We call upon State government to stop sand mining and strengthen enforcement mechanisms to this effect. We also call upon fishermen involved in commercial sand mining to resist from doing so irrespective of reasons for doing so.

16. Catchment areas of rivers consisting of forest is part of riverine system. Any destructive intervention can cause detrimental impact on Fisheries. Protection of Forest is of prime importance. Plans to divert Mhadei river, Diversion of Forest Land for mining projects and destruction of forest in Mollem's Mahavir Wildlife Sanctuary by central government negatively impact health of rivers and fisheries in Goa. We call for defence of forest as well as protection of people historically residing inside forest. We call for increase in collaboration between defenders of western Ghats forest and defenders of Fisheries to launch collaborative initiatives by moving out of their respective comfort zones as nature is intricately connected and sensitive. 

17. COVID-19 pandemic forced on people all over the world with intention to Illuminati enslavement agenda by destroying freedom has affected Goa too. Coastal areas are affected very badly. Fishing communities too were pushed under mask control and police control. Fishing was shut down and sale of fish was banned. Fisheries department used this pretext to deny subsidies to fishers. We call upon increased public focus on role of Illuninaties and Freemasons in pushing for destruction of Freedom by creating health emergency to rule the world. Pandemic is actually planned destruction of business of small scale initiatives including fishing activities as revealed from World at Risk Report of August 2019.

18. There is a felt need for a freedom think tank that will study and guide actions on Fisheries across actors and sectors. This is required to stand up to the complex challenges our our time that are marked by multiple attacks on Fisheries simultaneously.  Members of the think tank will require to share regularly with fishing communities in Goa and beyond.

19. We acknowledge that Agriculture and Fishing enjoyed symbiotic relationship on river banks in Goa. However over the past years bunds of the paddy fields are breached and saline water is let in to flood the paddy fields destroying agriculture for fishing purposes. We strongly disapprove such practices. Also daming of Mhadeo river in Sattari talukas has deprived spaces for Goa's unique temporary seasonal agriculture in flowing river known as Puran Sheti by local people. We advocate revival of Puran Sheti in Goa in fresh waters.

20. We note tremendous pressure on fishing communities due coast squeeze occurring due to rich lobbies buying coastal land and objecting fishing activities as in case of Siridao  where violence was deployed under to cut down fishing nets on Siridao beach. We note with alarm rising tension that led to burning down of fishing cannoe at Bambolim beach by corporate lobby under cover of the night.

21. Considering the way Government of India has enacted three anti-farmer laws in the Indian Parliament pushing farmers on roads is a clear indication that governance in India has taken over by invisible behind the scene Masonic operators. We call upon all fishers in Goa to not only support the farmers but also be perennially prepared to intensify the agitations with tact and sound strategy.

Above points are to be studied further and acted upon. Your co-operation is absolutely necessary. 

December 09, 2020

Thursday 5 November 2020

Call to scrap Nauxim Marina


Date: November 05, 2020


All Goa Small Scale Responsible Fisheries Union calls for scrapping of Marina project in Zuari river at Nauxim Goa on following grounds:


1. Lease deed of Kargwal constructions private Limited and Mormugao Port Trust (MPT) dated 12/10/2010 for approximately 1,00,000 square meters of water front of Zuari river for 30 years at the rate of Rs.4.87 per square meter per month is ill conceived from the beginning by vested interests to expel fishers from Zuari river and trigger food insecurity.


2. The lease agreement doesn't even acknowledge existence of fishing activities in Zuari river even though its permitted by Goa Fisheries department.


3. The lease agreement that is based upon the decisions of MPT that has ignored fishing activities in Zuari River as evident from the minutes. The sole criteria cited in the minutes to lease out Zuari River without consulting local traditional fishers is to generate incomes for MPT even if that requires expulsion of fishing activities.


4. The lease agreement that is based upon the Ports Land Policy prepared by Union Union ministry of Shipping is based on unjust principles that ignore fishing activities in Zuari river.


5. The Union government asserting its Jurisdiction over Zuari river and bestowing powers to MPT through a gazette notification of May 24, 2000 was done in an unethical manner without consulting with communities who are involved in fishing inside Zuari river for time immemorial. The consequences of such a nefarious act are the expulsion of fishing communities from Zuari River. All notifications of Central government extending MPT jurisdictions over Zuari River must be immediately withdrawn to avoid expulsion of fishers from Zuari River.


6. The ecological dangers of Marina to marine ecology are officially placed on record by Goa Bio-diversity Board in case of Yatch Haven marina by Chowgules inside Zuari River on Sancoale river front. Same report is relevant to Nauxim Marina too.


7. Fishing communities are opposing marina at Nauxim based on their wisdom accumulated over the centuries. As per their understanding Marina project at Nauxim will destroy both human habitat at river coast as well fish habitats in Zuari River. Fisheries will suffer to an unimaginable extent.


8. The understanding of fishers that it will destroy fisheries is confirmed by the impact quantification calculations presented in the EIA report prepared for Nauxim marina and put out in public domain by Goa State Pollution Control Board.


9. The joint reading of Tables 5.2 and 5.9 reveals that Fisheries in Zuari River will have permanent negative impact of the nature that is major, long-term and irreversible. Fisheries can be destroyed in this manner only if marine environments are destroyed and the cited tables do indicate major long term negative impacts to marine environment.


10. The laws and policies of India that provide powers to Ports overriding the existing fishing activities are based upon unethical foundations of injustice, inequality, impoverishment, livelihood destruction, damage to marine ecology and promoting food insecurity. These laws and policies needs to be done away with urgently.


11. Marina at Nauxim is combined assault on livelihood of fishing communities from several Coastal villages on Zuari river northern and southern bank and on food security of several people who are dependent upon fish as an ingredient of their food.


12. Ignoring all the above points on October 05, 2020 Kargwal Constructions private limited from Sion, Mumbai has filed Writ of Mandamus at the Goa Bench of Bombay High Court against State of Goa. Writ has called upon the Court to determine (a) whether Public Consultation is required as it is mandatory requirement by law, and (b) whether indefinite postponement of environmental public hearing in case of "Ahoy Marina" at Nauxim is unjust to the project proponent.


13. As last 10 years of public struggle has ensured non-enforcement of marina at Nauxim it is now urgent that the project be scrapped totally by cancellation of the lease deed itself rather than put the issue languishing for further litigations causing tensions and unrest to the fishing communities of Goa.


You are called upon to act decisively on the above matter.

Roque Menezes



Monday 9 March 2020

Goa Special Ferry 454.54% price hike: protest letters to Chief Minister, River Navigation Minister

Date: March 09, 2020

The Chief Minister,
Government of Goa
Porvorim, Goa

The Minister for River Navigation,
Government of Goa
Porvorim, Goa

Subject: Protest against Special Ferry Price Hike notification


It has come to our attention through notice pasted on Vanxim ferry that River and Navigation department has hiked fare of Special Ferry service from Rs.55/- to Rs.250/-: 454.54% hike on all routes in Goa. We write to express our strong protests as that will adversely affect the public navigating over rivers using Government Ferry service.We would like to remind you that Special Ferry service system was started after an incident in the decade of 1990s wherein Ferry at Vanxim refused to ply at mid-night (00.30 hours) in emergency situation of taking sick person for medical assistance. Late Ligorio F. Silveira brought this issue to the attention of then Captain of Ports and Special Ferry Service system was stared to cater to all needs of plying beyond regular hours.

You are therefore requested to roll back your proposal to hike the special ferry costs and keep it at current rate of Rs.55/-.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,
Maggie Silveira
President, Goa State

Thursday 27 February 2020

Objections to the Blue Economy assault on Goa’s rivers

Date: February 27, 2020
The Captain of Ports,
Government of Goa,
Panjim, Goa

Subject: Objections to the Blue Economy assault on Goa’s rivers


It has come to our attention from the reports in media that Goa Government through your office is in the process of launching major assault on Goa’s rivers by setting up Jetties in various parts of Goa without holding Public hearing under the pretext that they are floating Jetties. It has also come to our attention that your office is all set to launch another major assault on Goas rivers by initiating dredging of various rivers of Goa like Chapora, Mandovi, Sal, Cumbharjua and Zuari without holding Public Hearings for the same.

Because of irresponsible attitude of your office barges has already created siltation of Goa’s major rivers like Mandovi, Zuari and Cumbharjua and recorded in the minutes of Goa State Pollution Board first meeting held on October 05th 1988 destroying precious marine ecology of these rivers and still remains in a same state. Your office carried on EIA of Chapora river but why is it not shared with Public?

Because of irresponsible attitude of your office six of Goa’s rivers are declared as National Waterways without consulting fishing communities of these rivers. Because of irresponsible attitude of your office Mandovi river is conquered and assaulted by off shore casinos denying valuable space for small scale fishers.

Dredging is a major assault on marine life and your office is not bothered about it as if no one in your office is eating fish nor your office is bothered about hundreds of peoples engaged in fishing activities in Goa’s rivers. Dredging for Shipping purposes are known to create several problems such as Air and water pollution, sea floor erosion, wave and current regime alterations, introduction of invasive species, underwater noise pollution, land use change, water front congestion, health and labour issues and number of other ecologically destabilizing practices, environmental injustice, unequal power relations and social conflicts. Dredging of Mandovi river by Champions island has damaged marine ecology as informed by local fishermen from Diwar island and several marine species has disappeared.

Your decisions to set up Jetties and dredging of rivers is in violation of Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication (SSF Guidelines) India is signatory to SSF Guidelines and has committed to their enforcement via Article 54 of the National Marine Fisheries Policy 2017. It is also violation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): 14 Life under water. Government widened roads to make them six land and destroyed several paddy field and people dependent upon the same. Now your office is determined to destroy livelihood of several more fisher people by destroying marine ecology to promote shipping industry. Shame!

Your are therefore requested to immediately respect Goa’s rivers and its marine ecology, stay away from launching assaults in the form of construction Jetties and Dredging of rivers for Shipping purpose in Goa. Destroying Goa’s rivers by your office will only aggravate situation of hunger that currently stands at 7000 deaths per day as per community kitchen case proceedings in Supreme Court of India.

Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
Maggie Silveira
President, Goa State & National Council Member of National Platform of Small Scale Fish Workers (Inland)  

Illegal stone quarry damaging agriculture in Colomba

Date: February 27, 2020
The Director,
Department of Mines and Geology,
Panjim, Goa

Subject: Illegal stone quarry damaging agriculture in Colomba


This is to bring to your attention illegal operation of stone quarry at Colomba, Sanguem near the Hiralal Khodidas mine during night and early hours of the day. This activity is badly affecting nearby paddy fields cultivated by Scheduled Tribes People namely Devki Katu Velip, Tulsidas Velip, Rajani Velip and their family members. In rainy season the muddy water from the stone quarry also likely to flow in paddy fields as well as in Kushavati river destroying marine ecology and fishing.

For further directions to the site of this illegal quarry kindly contact Motesh Antao on his mobile: 9168206872. Kindly act.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,
Maggie Silveira

President, Goa State & National Council Member of National Platform of Small Scale Fish Workers (Inland)

Law and Order problem due to Illegal Trawler fishing in Zuari river

Date: February 27, 2020
­For Urgent Action

The Director,
Directorate of Fisheries,
Panjim, Goa
Superintendent of Police (Coastal Security)
Panjim, Goa

Subject: Law and Order problem due to Illegal Trawler fishing in Zuari river


Kindly attend to the ongoing rampant illegal trawler fishing in Zuari river from Sao Jacinto Island upto Siridao coast. This fishing using destructive fishing gears (trawl nets) has began on January 16, 2020 (Goa Opinion Poll Day and Feast of St. Joseph Vaz) during day and night. Several telephonic messages complaining against trawlers were conveyed at the Fisheries Control Room by many fishermen from Odxel, Cacra, Nauxim, Bambolim and Siridao.  Some calls were relayed to Coastal Security Police Station at Harbour for action by Fisheries department. However it has been observed that trawlers has continued to carry on illegal and destructive fishing within any respect to law and order. Yesterday afternoon (12.15 pm) over 16 trawlers and (05.30 pm) 18 trawlers was seen carrying on illegal fishing in Zuari from St. Jacinto Island upto Siridao-Agassaim destroying river bed as well as livelihood of small scale fishers of Zuari river.
Goa’s State laws are stringent against illegal and destructive fishing trawler practices within 5 kms from the coastline and inside rivers. However enforcement of these laws is absent or pathetic due to lack of commitment from your office even though your salaries are paid by Public. The irresponsibility from your office has led violation of Goa State fisheries Laws, violation of aims and objectives of Coastal Security Police, violation of Article 5.16 of Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication (SSF Guidelines), violation of Article 6.18 of Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (CCRF). India is signatory to SSF Guidelines, CCRF and has committed to their enforcement via Articles 53 & 54 of the National Marine Fisheries Policy 2017. It is also violation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): 14 Life under water. Your office has ignored these so far and it is a serious public concern and disastrous consequences in Zuari river.
This situation has led to the increasing public suspicions that Fisheries department and Coastal Security Police is actually promoting destructive fishing practices such as Trawling in Zuari River for the reasons best known to you. Fisheries department has even awarded those responsible for destructive trawling with LED lights during ‘Aqua Goa’ mega fish festival 2020 held on February 13th-15th at Panjim.
You are called upon to (1) carry on 24 hours surveillance of Zuari river from Odxel coast and permanently stop further illegalities by trawlers. (2) Assess damage done to marine ecology due to trawling in Zuari and recovers damages from trawler owners. (3) Compulsorily install GPS transponders on all trawlers in Goa so to make them visible online in real time at Global Fishing Watch. (4) Withdraw above mentioned award given to those engage in destructive fishing.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,
Maggie Silveira

President, Goa State & National Council Member of National Platform of Small Scale Fish Workers (Inland)

Illegal Sand mining in Mandovi river opposite Vanxim Church

Date: February 27, 2020

The Collector (North Goa),
Panjim, Goa

Department of Mines and Geology,
Panjim, Goa

Subject: Illegal Sand mining in Mandovi river opposite Vanxim Church


This is to request your urgent attention to take action against ongoing illegal sand mining going on by use of canoes in Mndovi river opposite Santus Christus Church, Vanxim island. Extracted sand is transported via Trucks from Vanxim in a Ferry boat. We have received information that police officers attached to Old Goa Police station are involved in this illegal sand extraction. This is the reason for continues sand extraction in spite of High Court order against the same.

Kindly act and stop the above mentioned activity of sand extraction that is destroying marine ecology and fishing activities in Mandovi river.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,
Maggie Silveira
President, Goa State & National Council Member of National Platform of Small Scale Fish Workers (Inland)

Protest against Special Ferry Price Hike proposal

Date: February 27, 2020
The Captain of Ports,
Panjim, Goa

Subject: Protest against Special Ferry Price Hike proposal

It has come to our attention through media reports that your office is proposing to hike fare of Special Ferry service from Rs.55/- to Rs.250/-. We write to express our strong protests as that will adversely affect the public navigating over rivers using Government Ferry service. We would like to remind you that Special Ferry service system was started after an incident in the decade of 1990s wherein Ferry at Vanxim refused to ply at mid-night (00.30 hours) in emergency situation of taking sick person for medical assistance. Late Ligorio F. Silveira brought this issue to the attention of then Captain of Ports and Special Ferry Service system was stared to cater to these needs of plying beyond regular hours.

You are therefore requested to withdraw your proposal to hike the special ferry costs and keep it at current rate of Rs.55/-.

Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
Maggie Silveira
President, Goa State & National Council Member of National Platform of Small Scale Fish Workers (Inland)

Monday 24 February 2020

Discussions in and around a dusty Foot Film titled ‘The Sea of Change: Traditional Fish workers’ perception of Climate Change’

Sebastiao  Anthony Rodrigues
Doctoral candidate at Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences (BITS), Pilani – Goa Campus, Zuarinagar, Goa
This paper attempts to discuss and critically reflect on the myriad of issues thrown up by the video documentary The Sea of Change: Traditional Fish workers’ perception of Climate Change. The crisis emerging from the Global issue of Climate is affecting coastal areas of India. Melting of Glaciers of Antarctica led to ongoing rise of Sea Level. This gradual rise has affected coastal people specially the traditional fisher people in most direct manner. The video documentary has attempted to locate this alarming situation in the complex situation of fisher people already in the vulnerable position due to various prevailing existing factors like industrial fishing, sand mining, industrial pollution etc. The film has been termed as ‘dusty foot film’ by its producers ‘International Collective in Support of Fishworkers’. The film covers three important locations where the focus is located: Andhra Coast, Pondicherry Coast on the Eastern shoreline of India and Mumbai Coast on the Western shoreline. The film interspersed expert interviews with the fisher people in these three locations. While experts are given their due recognition of identity in the form of names and designations the Fishworkers are denied the same except on one case of ‘Simon’ from Mumbai coast. Is this ethical way of supporting the traditional Fishworkers? The film further arrives at the conclusion that even though the Climate Change is destined to negatively affect traditional fisher people they are completely out of State policy framework to put in place mechanism to tackle the same. This is the reason perceptions of climate change are sort for and presented. Paper presents pointers from Goa Coast with sporadic contextualization. This is done in order to dig out the relevance of this film for the traditional fishermen in Goa and also to further increase support base to traditional fisher people in India.

Key words: Traditional Fishing, Climate Change, Coastal Conflicts
International Collective in Support of Fishworkers (ICSF) has come out with intellectual intervention in defense of Traditional Fishworkers. This words ‘Fish workers’ has been used inter-chargeable manner with the words ‘Fisher People’. In this paper the two words are used with no change in meaning. The film is titled as ‘The Sea of Change: Traditional Fish workers’ perception of Climate Change’ and of 26 minutes and 30 seconds duration. The film is directed by Rita Banerji. The film also has co-director Kiran Mittal who also composed script of this film. The film is curiously described as ‘A dusty Foot Film’ and ICSF hold Copyright. The film is produced in 2015 and is meant to increase the support base to the traditional fisher people. Pooja Iyengar is the Editor of this Film. The film has sourced its research resources from various agencies such as Climate Change and Fisheries (ICSF), the Challenged Coast of India (PondyCAN), Marine Fish Landings in India 2013 (CMFRI), Moving Home (Nagraj Adve) Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (India) and World Ocean Review. So the film is sufficiently grounded in research.
The film also has narration of various fisher people attached to the number of Organizations. The Organizations listed in this regard includes Fishing Communities and Fishworkers Organisations of Kakinada, Shuddhawati and Mumbai. In Kakinada the Organization is Integrated Coastal Management. Other Organizations includes Maharashtra Macchimar Kruti Samiti (MMKS), Satpaty Maccimar Vividh Karyakari Sahhakari Society, The Amala Fishworkers’ Karyalaya Sahakari Society. In addition the films also have inputs from Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS).
The Poetic Approach
Though poetry in nature is rarely captured in the film it still welcomes the viewers:
Alone…I pray to nature
Alone…I may not survive (Allenika)
The words are poetry in the beginning and the scenes in the middle are tumults to the core though no poet is quoted to capture those scenes as camera was more than a Poet. The approach is significant for it locates someone alone. Perhaps the fisherman alone, perhaps fishing community alone; and alone prayer is offered to nature. Even before nature could answer prayer there is already revelation: Alone…I may not survive. So that sets the approach of the film into pace: the battle for survival. Living is far off. The fight is from the people on the fringes of the Indian Coast; from the communities into fishing for many generations tossed around politically just like the waves on the shores toss up with added power of Sea level rise. The film has made attempt to capture these tossing ups of the communities of traditional fisher people with probe of a camera soliciting their views. The process is bound to have some humanizing effect as fisher people are presented in the first person non-manipulative narrations.
The Mapped Approach
Film though described as dusty is pretty heavily loaded with intellectual rigor. For the reasons of visual presentations Map of Indian Peninsula is used for the purpose of depicting Indian Coastline with inscribed description on it. Map point to the Arabian Sea to the West where Goa too is located, Indian Ocean to the South and Bay of Bengal to the East. Climate Change impact is felt in all three directions. The films narrates that 30% of India’s population is living on the coast. There is village on the average every 2 kms. India has 8,118 kms shoreline and it is one of the most closely populated regions of the World. The coastal waters support almost 30% of the India’s population through fishing. This coastline of India is home to 4 million marine fisher folks and they have their livelihoods in Sea. The film also claims that India is second largest fishing nation of the world with annual turnover of 3.78 million tons; in this Indian Traditional Fishermen contribute significantly. Film leave for the viewers enough teasers to probe as to which is the largest fishing nation in the world and how far ahead of India in its annual turnover and who is lagging behind India in fishing turnover in economic sense. Film narrates that fishing provides direct employment to large and self-sustaining community. Even though narration is fairly rosy up to this point it confronts sudden rough weather and the power of storms is reflected in words “reality presents contradictory image: hash and unfair at times.”
The Stormy Approach
The harshness is not new to fisher people. Storms are not new to Fish workers. Film penetrates to the rough times with an arrow of words “traditional fishermen have always struggled against the natural and man-made threats.” Now however there is a new threat and the arrow of words slows down to diagnose, “the question: How far Global Climate Change is going to affect them? How far these areas will be able to retain residential and economic value of the coast in the years to come?” these questions are posed in a manner of anxiety and rightly so. Such a great threat looming all over and very little understanding of the same with fishing communities could prove catastrophic. These are right questions to pose. Answers are sought with the coastal fishing communities. Film narrates that traditional fishing communities have traditional knowledge of the sea fine tuned over centuries can provide key links to coastal land forms and dynamics of climate change. Film completes this triple approach route – Poetic Approach, Mapped Approach and The stormy Approach just in the beginning 2 minutes and 23 seconds before the title of the film ‘The Sea of Change: Traditional Fishworkers’ perception of Climate Change’ appears.
With Smiles from Andhra Coast
The film then begins actual traverses on the Indian Coast beginning from Andhra Pradesh facing Bay of Bengal. The scene begins with a smiling female fish worker smiling to the camera from her sit in three wheeler yellow coloured auto rickshaw with word in Red ‘JESUS’ picking up pace on the road. As the rickshaw comes closer to the camera the smiling face of this nameless woman is complimented by waving of hands as if to transmit warm vibrations in spite of looming Global Climate Crisis. It presented the picture of the beach that resembles so much to the Morjim beach two decades ago when tourism was not prevalent there in North Goa. Actually we are told in the film it is Kakinada beach in Andhra Pradesh. And the story of Andhra Pradesh Coast begins like rain drops of the first shower of the summer: Andhra Pradesh has 900 kilometers of Coastline. It has 8,70,000 fishers in traditional fishing communities. Camera then moves on the edge of the Kakinada Beach and provokes interactions with the coastal communities and interviewing them on any change they might have noticed over the period of time.
Driving along retired stoned wall on a stretch of beach conversation is picked up with a driver of the vehicle without disclosing his name and identity. The man at the wheel explains that the road is remade three times because Sea kept coming in slowly. Fishing boats were captured by camera as being parked on the roadside just like cars. Then camera is out on the beach amongst the fisher people and the interactions to solicit their perception on Climate Change begins with English subtitles to those who are not able to follow the language of fisher people.
The Climate Crisis
Climate Change is more palatable pill to swallow in a wrapped two words. The explorations from this film have left hardly any doubt that what we are actually confronting is the Climate Crisis if not Climate Warfare. Fisher People of Andhra Coast have been quoted fairly exhaustively in the film. “We have been here for 50 years and the Sea has been eroding the Coast. There were beaches here, we would use nets. Fish landing was in large quantities, beaches were fish drying areas. When we were small, the sea used to be way ahead.” What this fisherman wants to convey from his memory is self explanatory. Now female fish worker -without name on screen speaks up “No, I haven’t seen any changes; just the sea has quietly came closer and closer. Earlier the sea was 20 km away, now it is at 2 km. earlier there were only 4 storms in a year, now a days, we get about 10 storms in a year.” Then another fisherman expresses “Our catch was much bigger 10-20 years ago, now the catch is very less.” The ramifications of the Climate Crisis are captured in these first person narrations.
The film commentary continues with a back voice. “Coast is an interface between the Land, Ocean and Atmosphere, and is shaped as much by the natural process as human influences. Nearly 40% of India’s coastline consists of vital stretches of sandy beaches. They are pertaining to the life of traditional fish workers. They are secure extension of village where Fish workers land, lower their fish, trade and dry the fish and mend its nets. For livelihood support beaches are central to the life of fishermen in social cultural context. For the fish worker life without beach is not imaginable.” With these interesting clues films moves ahead and gets two smiling girls with basket full of fish mounted on their heads walk by.
And now comes the turn of an expert to intersperse in the discussion. The first one is Satish Shenoy, INOIS, Hyderabad. He is quoted “Now because of monsoon there is some erosion there. And now erosion has come little inside. We make hue and cry dump some stones there, and those stones are preventing the beach to come back. And it becomes the area of permanent erosion. So it adds to the vulnerability due to anthropogenic intervention.” After the expert comments there is blackout on the screen. The crisis is symbolically depicted well. Solution turned into a problem. One is reminded of call of the fisher people of khareawaddo, Vasco to put up break water and even been agreed and promised by local MLA Milind Naik. One may ask whether this is going to be additional anthropogenic intervention further pushing fishing communities towards vulnerability due to wrong demands.
Enter Uppada
Screen returns and we find ourselves watching another beach in Andhra Pradesh: Uppada. We are given insights into comparative history: This is one of the first villages to experience severe shoreline degradation. Then immediately a picture of stoned beach confronts our eyes. One is left to wonder as what is the crime committed by this Uppada beach for it getting stoned. We are led to further deeper intimate reality of the sagacity of this beach: formerly some 30 years back, it had a wide beach of up to one and half kilometer. This village - we are informed via narration – is for beach landing operations; today we are not seeing traces of sand here. During last ten years, this beach is completely eroded. Half the village is lost and half the village relocated somewhere.
Both the villages – Kakinada and Uppada certain common observations were made by the villagers. Narration records “It is noticed by Fishworkers of Kakinada and Uppada that there were destruction in physical and biological environment of shoreline. Tracts of beaches are all inundated by the Sea.” This is the reason the film is titled as Sea of Change. Cultural and Spiritual life of the communities is often based on physical and biological environment even though it has not been the subject focus of this film but there is pointer in the film in this direction that can be detected by careful listening ear.
Sea Level Rise projections
Next film introduces an expert to the viewers. He is E. Vivekananda, a retired Principal Scientist, CMPR Chennai. Perhaps it is assumed by the Film that every one viewing the film is familiar with abbreviation CMRI or the team that made this film believes that it is better to conceal the full abbreviation of CMRI. Nowhere in the film is it explained as to what these four alphabets stand for. Vivekananda speaks “We have the clear map of Sea level rise. One Millimeter Sea level rise every year is trivial matter for public but it is very serious. Because one millimeter rise in Sea level will flood at least 10 or 15 kilometer area near the coastline. The cyclones have also pushed these communities into internal areas.” ‘We’ of Vivekananda statement refers to the scientists and not the affected public. And this is very serious as he admits. And he has clear map of the oncoming climate change and looking at the visual of the maps on his computer screen as captured in the film looks that the rainbow lines of coastal disruption are already marked out and those people marked out are not informed about it. This approach clearly transforms the view of Climate Change into Climate Warfare. The arrogance of scientific community is so clearly decipherable from Vivekananda statement here. There is a silver lining here too and that is the films has recorded his statements and circulating amongst wide range of people so that Scientific community can be held accountable to share the projections from their board rooms rather rapidly with public and Public Organizations seriously looking at Climate Crisis issues. Two issues are visible from his statement that we need to take note here: Sea level rise leading to flooding of the land and the cyclones pushing communities into interior areas.
Ferocious Cyclones
Film at this juncture temporarily departs from the experts and allows village people speak. No name of any of the villagers is mentioned only faces and the voices are made visible and audible. There is a sharp contrast in the way film has gone about presenting experts with full honor and respect by disclosing their complete name, surname and designation. Villagers are not presented in this manner. They are stripped off their names and every thing else that come with it. Villagers narrate their perception of cyclones of recent times “The cyclones were not as horrible as nowadays. There used to be 2 or 3 in a year, now there are continues, strong cyclones. The winds which flow earlier were balanced and favorable.” At this point film throws up four important issues of alarm: Increased Ferocity of Cyclones and Winds, increased erosion, loss of beaches, and Livelihoods in danger. All the four issues thrown up here are very dangerous for coastal people of India. After enumerating the four issues the film asks “The question is how rapidly and to what extend Climate Change will impact our Seas?” This way of questioning is end centered approach to climate crisis. The method of rising questions has to be changed. The effective question to ask here is when will the world would start de-industrializing, shut down its nuclear and thermal power plants and cease the warming up of planet earth? There is no thinking done on these lines as a result debate is moving in very depressing moment of letting the those truly responsible for global climate crisis go scot free. If the right questions like this were raised then there would have been massive mobilization in India and pressure mounted on those responsible to heat up the earth that is melting Antarctica’s ice. Several letters of protests would have been sent to the Embassies of so many countries engaging in heating up the planet Earth.
Four-fold attack on Coast
The film then sends out lone captions one by one four times. This is perhaps done after due filtering of wider issues surrounding Indian coast. The first danger presented as increased ferocity of cyclones and winds. The word ‘winds’ is covered with extraordinary significance of danger with red color fonts in the film. The second danger presented is increased erosions. The third danger is loss of Beaches. The fourth attack presented is livelihoods in danger. The assumption is no longer now whether there is change in climate or not. “The question is how rapidly and to what extend Climate Change will impact our seas” interrogation continues. Then the dusty film transcends national boundary and gets into global perspective of Climate Crisis with the tool of World Map. Then commentary begins: ‘Studies have indicated that we have lost 40% of the ice cover since 1980’s leading to increase in global temperatures. Film presents dusk on eroded beach and commentary continues: Sea levels world wide has witnessed rise by 3.5 millimeters annually since 1990s’. The focus now shifts on Antarctica on the map of Globe. A video of melting glaciers of Antarctica and commentary continues: ‘This will result in flooding of low-lying areas of coastline. There may be increase in intensity and frequency of cyclones in future’. Film has still not taken definitive stance on likelihood of increase in intensity and frequency of cyclones in future and is marked with ‘may be’. That marks recognition of unpredictability of whether conditions and its acknowledgement by the Film.
Film cites the India Country Study prepared in 1995 by Ministry of Environment and Forest that presents likely reality of rise in Sea level could put 7.1 million people into displacement. Film then draws its own conclusion: ‘It could push traditional fishing communities to the fringes of survival’. This is a most likely scene of the future considering that coastal communities are hardly grappling with the Climate Crisis issues and when it actually hits it may be too late to turn around the tide. Film assesses current state of India’s beaches with the support of a recent study that is not named yet its findings presented. It claims “according to recent report 1,500 kms of beach in India is eroded to various degrees. This is almost 25% of India’s shoreline”. One wonders as when such a massive claims are made what is the reason for which study has been kept without naming thereby causing one of the major breaches of the credibility of this film that is otherwise grounded in research. Erosion of 1,500 kms of beach on India’s shoreline is attributed to various factors such as Thermal Power Plants, Ports, Harbours, Sea Walls, Breakwaters and Sand mining. Climate Crisis can find these already existing factors as an appetizer in order to place its prey as the Sea Water level rises and cyclones increase in intensity and frequency.
Ponderings based on Puducherry coast
Film now gets its focus on Puducherry, a Union Territory that was earlier known as Pondicherry was a French colony in India on the East coast of India like Goa that was Portuguese Colony on the West Coast of India. Coastal Management Consultant associated with an organization PondyCAN Aurofilio Schiawina is interviewed here. He is presented saying “We at Puducherry has been documenting the change in Pondicherry and neighboring Tamil Nadu coast. One thing that is distinct is shoreline is changing due to man made factors. Harbour was built in 1989. Coastline changed; harbor blocked sand. There is no renewal of sand. Erosion knows no boundary. It does not know that it has stop at Ponycherry boundary and that it cannot move into neighboring state” Maps and data is shown existing on the laptop screen in the office of Aurofilio Schiawina. There is hardly anything to dispute with his findings. The point that Schiawina is making is that construction of Harbour in 1989 has created blockade for the flow of sand on the entire stretch of Tamil Nadu Coast. The sand was blocked from moving from one side of the Harbour to the next. This led to the disruptive erosion on the coast of Pondicherry and part of Tamilnadu.
Immediately Probir Banerjee, President of PondyCAN appears on screen to speak out “Our study has shown that erosion has been taking place at the rate of more than one meter per day just in Pondicherry coastline of 24 kms.” The commentary then continues “One can imagine the extend of land loss taking place all over the Indian Coast.” Probir Banerjee’s findings points to a type of reality that indicate India’s coast is on fire and is losing land for Sea level rise at the rate of more than one meter per day. And yet there is hardly any deeper level awareness amongst public. This film is a welcome step to awaken public consciousness into action on time.
Probir Banerjee is further quoted pointing that “Every State is busy granting permissions for the constructions of Ports and Harbors without taking national perspective on board with regard to demand for Ports. Unless you match the existing land with various demands you cannot get right picture”. This is a very important input to the film. Further it may be added that expansion of existing Ports and setting up of Marinas is also a matter of deep concern in Indian coast as evident from the State of Goa. These developments are taking place not because of local demands but global demands of super rich and International military-industrial-political complex leading to backward insertion of State of Goa into Global War Economy with Goa designating as Rest And Recreation (R-N-R) destination of International warships.
Onto Mumbai Fishing Coast
After the Eastern Coast film then shifts its focus on the West coast of India. It focus is largely Maharashtra coast with Mumbai that has been historically important city. Film narrates that “Mumbai has 32 fishing villages”. After this statement of survey the next statement is of crisis: “India’s largest slum Dharavi is located in Koli fishing village. Fishing community in Mumbai has been pushed to the fringe by Real Estate Invasion, Pollution and Shrinking of their areas. There is added threat of Climate Change”. Dr.V.V.Singh Principal Scientist, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mumbai is introduced in the film. He has mapped the Mumbai Coast divided the coast into three colors depending on the impact of Sea level rise. The three color codes used are Red, Blue and White.
Next presented is the footage of fisher people meeting with the authorities at Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC). It has been narrated that various fishing villages are waging their struggle for space. And from the one fisher delegate tell the authorities “There are over two lakh fish workers in Mumbai. BMC has turned our Seas into dumping yards.” Another fish worker speaks out on reality “In Sion, Koliwada land was given to them to resettle and another piece of land for creating educational institutions but nothing was built”. Third fish worker without name - as per the dominant practice followed in this film - speaks out “People encroach on our land, destroy our ecology and livelihoods and make bogus complaints about us and demolish our houses.” The fourth fish worker spoke out “We are not against development but you should win our trust when you do development.” So here we have mockery of all the government propaganda of inclusive development. The reality of promise and the betrayal is not new anywhere in the country. This has been common practice followed de facto. The point is how to launch sufficient impetus to change this thought pattern and action pattern to move on with collective program to transcend all these blocks.
Anil Choudary, Advisor, Satpati Macchimar Vividh Karyakari Sahakar Society Ltd is presented in the film. Satpati struggles with developmental threats already as has been disclosed by Anil Choudary. “Stonewall was made 10 years back when there was erosion due to rise in Sea water. You can see next to stonewall how much has eroded from here. Almost 50 feet to 60 feet has eroded. From June to October the direction of the waves changes, and eroded sand gets into the creek.” The pictures of eroded shores are included in film and also the growth of mangroves on the accumulated sand. Anil Choudary observes again, “25 years back there were no mangroves here and it has now spread another 500 meters.” This is an interesting issue on sand erosion and the history of mangrove growth. In Goa ecological history of Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary also has its origin in abandonment of agriculture in reclaimed lands in Mondovi River. Abandonment of agriculture gave rise to mangroves. Thick growth of mangroves gradually attracted birds. Forest department then declared it as Bird Sanctuary few decades ago.
Then Dr.V.V.Singh Principal Scientist, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mumbai comes back second time with a pertinent observation, “There is natural as well as man made sediment flow which affect the coastline changes.” These changes then lay initial conditions for intense coastal crisis.
Micro observations from the fisher peoples’ organization intersperses here with activist critical input. Ujjwala J. Patil, Maharashtra Machimar Kruti Samitti is interviewed to get the grasp of happenings on ground. She spoke in Marathi facilitated by English subtitles. “Lots of fish used to be dried here but because of erosion, the sand has gone into the Sea. The next step will be when all these houses will get washed away too.”
The film discloses that release of waste from industry and consumer goods creates pollution as they eventually flows into Ocean. Film then moves into the world of statistics. It discloses that 250 million people live close to coastal areas in India. 5.5 million liters of waste water is released into the Sea every day. This leads to pollution of coastal ecosystem a real menace.
Beach scene returns to the film so often. This time three fishermen are on the fishing boat answering to the camera. “All waste in Mumbai is dumped by Municipality near the Sea. All this flows into the Sea and harms our nets.” There are vivid pictures of plastic garbage floating in the Sea. The next question shot at fishermen “How much waste?” the Answer comes from all three “Our boats are filled by waste and our whole day is spent in separating waste from the fishes.” Woman is shown separating waste from the fish spread on land. Fishermen point out the spoil fish “We put 3 to 4 nets and get very little fish. See, this is our last night catch, all the fish has turned black, has got spoiled. See this prawn, its all spoiled.” Even though this spoilage is taking place on daily basis there is no effective mechanism put in place with collaborating researchers or if there are such research collaborations it has not been reported in the film. This is an area that needs follow up post film scenario.
Next on the screen is Kiran Koli, Chairperson, Mumbai Unit of Maharashtra Macchimar Kriti Samitti “Water up to 10 nautical miles has been polluted. There is no ban on plastic here.” There is hardly any ban even on land. Very few places that is strictly following ban on plastic is Sikkim state of India that has banned plastics in its capital Gangtok. But is ban on plastics in Arabian Sea is a solution? If it is so then how does one enforce it? Or is ban on plastic production is better option? We need to wonder and come to conclusion very soon. And these wonderings needs to be with coastal people engaged in fishing as equally responsible partners. And this exercise needs to be carried on across Indian coast. The question is as to from where the leadership for this would come about?
Fisherman then speaks about erosion and sedimentation on the coast, “Earlier all our boats were kept here on the shore. Now we are unable to keep our boats here”. Parking of fishermen boast is does not bother as urgency for the State. While the anticipated parking space for pleasure boats of the Super rich has led Murmagao Port Trust (MPT), Goa to sign two lease deeds on October 12 and 14 both in 2010 to set up marinas in Zuari River which are prime fishing spaces of the local fishermen. It is not that state cannot take necessary steps to solve problems of coastal people; the point is that it is not pro-active on it. In fact in its approach it is anti-coastal people as evident from now scrapped Coastal Management Zone (CMZ) law that had provisions that could lead to real estate invasion of coast and even the Seas. The resistance was possible largely due to national mobilization of coastal people.
“The other thing is illegal sand mining going in this place” Points out nameless fisherman standing on the beach that has developed depth resembling well in the process of being dug. Besides illegal sand mining there is also “an increase of Sea level is also a reason for sand erosion here.” So there are multiple reasons already in place that is supplementing Global Climate crisis.
Women and threatened fishing Professions
“Now there is no space, so we don’t get any place to dry the fishes. Due to this, we are affected and the profession of our women has been destroyed.” If profession of women gets destroyed like this it could have severe consequences for the entire family and society for it denies women respect and dignity as well. There are scenes where the fish drying is done by hanging fish on the wooden sticks whereas traditional fish drying practice was to dry fish on the sand on beach. Film observes “economy of fishing families are affected negatively due to these reasons.”
Ujjwala J. Patil, Maharashtra Machimar Kruti Samitti throws further light on the theme “From the time fish reaches the landing centre women take over the work. They segregate the fish, then dry it otherwise fish will get spoilt. They then will go to market and sell it.” One nameless female fish worker provides her perception here “Now there is less water in the Ocean, less fish. So if anything happens to our kids or if they are sick then who will look after them? Mosquitoes here have increased in this area and no one protects us in this condition.” This woman is concerned about not just about herself but also about her children, the next generation, and the future. It is her perception that water in the Ocean is less now. The challenge here is how to help her understand complex global dynamics of climate crisis and how she and her future has been jeopardized to do exploitative industrial production pattern pushing her and her community to the fringes. It is challenging that women like her to engage with in a discourse that will turn around her perception of ‘Ocean having less water now so less fish’ and transform into an agents of change. Hopefully public screening of this film in her village and other villages would trigger off necessary process.
Only if fishers were educated
Another fish worker shares his perception in the film “Yes, lots has changed in whether. There are stronger winds, there is rain also.” Film now gets into critical probe and gets interesting reply on cause of poor understanding of the fishermen “Because they are not well educated, they don’t understand, nor have they ever heard of ‘Climate Change’. They will only say ‘We just put our fish for drying and suddenly it started to rain!’ Who is responsible for keeping fishermen uneducated after 68 years of transfer of power from British rulers to Indian rulers? What the political parties have been doing after getting their votes from these fisher people for more than half century? The fruit of the Independence of India in 1947 is uneducated fisher people of its coast. It has been more like Law of Manu where education is denied to Shudras (slaves). Yet fishermen has vast knowledge accumulations over past so many generations, knowledge of fish, waves, currents, winds, torrents, storms, shore and diverse interactions on it.
One more Fisherman explains the scandal in Sea “Most probably there is scarcity of fish in the Ocean. So when boats go in nearby areas they don’t find any fish there. So the fisher folks are now sitting idle in their homes.” So when people sit idle most probable they will be gripped with depressions and frustrations. This may result in suicides or path of revolutions. Indian State is not scared of suicides as evident from farmers’ suicides in different parts of India like Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra over past few decades. However Indian State is worried on politicization of masses much beyond fishermen and is putting in place surveillance mechanism like Aadhaar Card, Electronic Voting Machines (EVM), High Security Number Plates, High Security systems with CCTV cameras in Schools, Beaches, Public Transport systems like Newly introduced batch of Kadamba buses in Goa, High surveillance security systems called smart cities, The Human DNA Profile Bill 2015 pending in Parliament and so many other repressive mechanisms including annual 15 lakhs killing of children in Indian that are camouflaged as deaths of children of ST, SC and OBC emanating from malnutrition.
So the cycle that is presented in the film is ‘Less Catch’ results in ‘Low Income’. Few fish species like White Fish, Hilsa Toil, Pellone, Milkshark and Sawfish are listed as vanished species. Fisherman then presented speaking on this topic, “The fishes which are not there nowadays are Hilsa, Salmon, Silver bar Fish”. Anther fishermen then interspersed “Silver bar fish is also not seen nowadays: very rarely seen, like they don’t exist anymore”. And yet one more fisherman quips to confirm “So many fishes have either vanished or depleted. New Fish species has come about due to Climatic Condition.” Still fourth nameless fisherman is included to further hammer the point of fish depletion in the film “There are lots of changes in this profession; earlier we used to return in 3-4 days, now we return in 10-12 days, sometimes even 15 days. New fishes are present at large distance.”
Irreversible decline
Film observes “irreversible decline of Indian Coast due to developmental activities as well as Climate Change processes…Communities that rely on natural resources are always vulnerable more so in future when Climate Change index is expected to intensify”. Both these statements are true. However film exclude tourism related invasion of Indian coast to set up starred hotels, Golf Courses, Marinas, etc by moneyed interests. This form of development is starkly visible in the State of Goa. There are also even more dangerous reports setting up nuclear power plants on coasts of India and release of nuclear waste in Arabian Sea. Goa is sandwiched between two nuclear power Plants one in North at Jaitapur, Maharshtra and another at South at Karwar. Absence of discussions of these aspects is very dangerous.
Film raises important question: Can Climate Change be viewed as stand alone issue isolated from already existing issues in fisheries sector? Dr.V.V.Singh Principal Scientist, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mumbai is summoned yet again. He seeks to answer “Maximum impact is by overfishing, followed by pollution, habitat degradation, and Climatic Change is last one. In the years to come Climate Change is going to be major problem to tackle it. Right now we do not have quick-fix solutions for it.”
Then one nameless fisherman speaks to camera with good deal of confidence “We fishermen protect this whole coastline and government must be thankful to us.” Only if this fisherman knew the origin of the word ‘government’ he would have different take. It is clear that no one explained to him that the word ‘Government’ has its origin in two Latin words ‘Guverno’ that mean ‘to control’ and ‘Mentis’ that means ‘mind’, and Government therefore in most true sense is mechanism for mind control.
Probir Banerjee, President of PondyCAN makes a comeback after a gap with precise comment “Once ecology is damaged, how you reverse the process – livelihoods have been lost and People have been displaced. What happens to those people? How do you, you may talk of rehabilitation, you may talk of compensation, what happens to People? They become refugees, Environmental Refugees.” Banerjee’s statement is true not only for coast but also for Goa’s hinterland open cast mining that has reduced Goa into land of ecological refugees.
Film then discusses government report ‘National Action Plan 2008’ that outlines existing and future mitigation and adaptation program. “It does not specifically address problems of Indian Coastal system. The Technical issues of Climate Change received great attention while socio-economic concerns remained largely unaddressed”.
Satish Shenoy, INOIS, Hyderabad comments on current state of affairs “Right now all studies are at government level or policy level. I don’t think we are penetrating down to fish workers but we have to develop that mechanism”. The prevailing notion as evident from Shenoy’s comment is hierarchical: Scientists are up and Fishermen are down. One is reminded of the Brahmanical law of Manu and its hierarchical gradation of people and privileges.
Dr.V.V.Singh Principal Scientist, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mumbai is more respectful of fisher people. He comments “Fishermen has great knowledge. Any mitigation or rehabilitation of fishermen cannot be done without support, co-operation and active involvement”. From his comment rehabilitation is inevitable. So fishermen all over Indian coast had to find new homes. The search must start now. Has it started? In Goa this is not the case. On the contrary high altitude plateaus are dished out to various avoidable interests like Mopa for new Greenfield Airport, Golf Course cum luxury hotels in Tiracol, Handing over of Quittol plateau to Indian Air force, Plateaus has also been handed over for industrial estates, IT parks, Mining, SEZ etc. Where Goa’s coastal people going to be rehabilitated? Goa has coastline of 105 kms.
Now there is lone fish worker in film with name ‘Simon’ from Mumbai and yet without surname speaks out “We see weather and can predict. If it will be stormy or not when we go out; we can predict to a certain degree”.
Ujjwala J. Patil, Maharashtra Machimar Kruti Samitti expands the scope far beyond fish workers “Fishing does not just feed only the fishermen, it feeds many more”. Probir Banerjee, President of PondyCAN attempts to plunge into future for Fishermen “What will fishermen do next, Can they became masons, carpenters or whatever?” The elderly female fish worker proves Probir Bannerjee has probed correctly. She comments “The biggest thing is, what will the next generation do?” This film advocate that attention be given to traditional fishing before Climate Change becomes anther area of concern. Film observes that in addition to overfishing, pollution, habitat degradation and competing interests from industry push towards inundation of coastline will increase vulnerability of traditional fishermen.
Preserve and Celebrate
This dusty film has fought all the temptation to be the film of doom and despair but instead has come to a rather surprising conclusion. Its concluding statement is full of hope and even calls for celebration. Film has this very remarkable concluding comment “Traditional Fishermen in One Billion population country to have four million plus fishing community that sustains itself by low footprints, traditional yet renewable reserves; it is a treasure that needs to be preserved and celebrated.” This conclusion deserves to be discussed for it is potent with diverse possibilities for Indian Coast and needs further extrapolation. The beauty of this film is that in spite of keeping fisher people nameless it still succeeds in generating waves of hope, an igniting of imagination and direct intervention on the Indian Coast. The film hints at celebration of life on coast that also includes various fishing related occupations and pre-occupations combine. This call to celebrate is single most powerful strength of this film that could trigger off something big. It calls to reverse our in-fashion understanding of traditional as essentially bad and backward. The film has given recognition and validity to what is known as traditional fishing and its practitioners. For intellectuals this conclusion has posed hue challenge to explain to the traditional fishing community the meaning of the word ‘footprints’. Film is excellent recipe for People-Intellectual collaboration.
Rayson K. Alex, who suggested and shared this film with me,
Maggie Silveira, my wife who helped me to follow through this paper.