ASI letter dated June 01, 2020 to Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar on all bogus Photograph, Plan and Elevation

ASI letter dated 23 March 2020 to Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar on violation of permission for repair

 

ASI letter of March 16, 2020 to Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar warning legal action

 

Waman Meshram calls for Bharat Band on June 25

 Rashtriya Parivatan Morcha

Bhahujan Kranti Morcha

Bharat Mukti Morcha 

 

Against the powers who are putting Unity and Integrity of Bharat in danger. 

 

On 25th June 2022 

 

Bharat Band 

 

Leadership: Hon. Waman Meshram

(National Convenor,  Bhahujan Kranti Morcha and Rashritya Parivartan Morcha (Social), New Delhi) 

 

APPEAL 

 

Collaborators,  the way Gyanvapi issue has been created by RSS and BJP, the way Mathura issue is raised after Ayodhya and the way- on the directions of BJP and RSS - Nupur Sharma spoke ill defamatory about Mohammad Paigambar is noted. 

 

Now 2022 is ongoing; and people at BJP and RSS feel that 2024 elections are not too far distant in time. In this context - to prepare for the elections - they are busy in creating polarization between Hindus and Muslims. In order to achieve this end they had commissioned Nupur Sharma for this task. Nupur Sharma gave her statements based on directions to her from the policy of the Party and the Organisation. This is the reason Party pretented as if action has been taken against her but BJP workers still seen supporting her. 

 

And the government too did not act against her in any way because of which several places witnessed riots. Because of the prevalence of riots India's unity and Integrity is in danger. 

 

Gandhi in order to unite Hindus transformed Freedom struggle with religios colour and used religious symbols through his life to gather common people. It is because of Gandhi Hindu-Muslim issue arose and intensified. This is the reason for partition of India. 

 

RSS and BJP carried this task after Gandhi again. Things are clear: if religious coloring task, religious polirisation task, Hindu-Muslim division accomplishing task continues then Nation's unity and Integrity will come under threat and danger of more partitions looms large. 

 

That's why it is very important that this trend is stopped. 

 

Brahmins finally got clear proof that they are foreigners. That's why if India's land gets further partitioned they have no regards. This is because brahmins are not natives (mulnivasis), are not Indians because DNA report has proved that they are foreigners. Their nationalism is only a  to save Brahmins and a ploy to end their foreignness. This nationalism that is meant to cover up their foreignness is inflamed through Hindu-Muslim division so that they can be polarized apart. 

 

This situation has threatened unity and Integrity of India. The way Hindu-Muslim polarization is going on India's unity and Integrity has come under risk. The way 57 nations commented indicate that the danger to India's unity and Integrity has proliferated further. And for those statements that foreign nations issued people from RSS and BJP are responsible and thy have pushed India's unity and Integrity towards peril. 

 

That's why in order to safeguard Nation's unity and Integrity there is a need to initiate huge action at the national level. And in order to enforce this social action, in order to support Nation's unity and Integrity, and those people who in the name of Hindu-Muslim have conspired to destroy Nation's unity and integrity; in opposition to them enforcing "Bharat Band" on 25th June 2022. 

 

-Waman Meshram 

 

ASI letter dated March 16, 2020 to Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar on permission violations

 

Do Not Compromise on Subsidies for Small Scale Fisheries

 On the Eve of the WTO Negotiations in Geneva

National Platform for Small Scale Fish Workers (NPSSFW) 

Implores the Government

Do Not Compromise on Subsidies for Small Scale Fisheries

Stop Subsidising Overfishing & Destructive Fishing

The biennial meeting of trade ministers from all 164 member nations is going to take place between June 12 and 15 in Geneva. The ministerial negotiations are to finalise the fate of fisheries subsidies provided by the governments of the world in their respective countries including in India.

NPSSFW strongly holds that subsidies provided to the small scale fisheries (SSF) are instrumental to protect sustainable fishing, large employment, equitable distribution of income, food security and nutritional status of our society. With more than 50% of work force being women the small scale fisheries sector has also to be supported for gender balance in employment. As such the provision of subsidies for SSF is non-negotiable.

NPSSFW further holds that subsidies for Small Scale Fisheries in the developing countries is beyond the mandate of WTO since these subsidies pertain more to management of fisheries than to international trade.

NPSSFW also holds that the traditional livelihood rights of small scale fisher people cannot be denied on the pretext of IUU (illegal, unregulated and unreported) fishing as the government has consistently failed to provide a legal, regulatory and reporting framework to protect the traditional and livelihood rights in small scale fisheries.

At the same time NPSSFW urges the government to stop all subsidies to the large scale mechanized fishing sector which is responsible for overfishing and destructive fishing. Subsidising trawlers and mechanized boats means subsidizing overfishing and destructive fishing. This should be stopped.

NPSSFW has been very upset to know that some persons have been handpicked by the government and taken to Geneva as non-government delegates from the fisheries sector. There has been a complete lack of transparency on the part of the government in this. The small scale fish workers’ organizations like NPSSFW were not even informed about the constitution of such a non-government delegation. The Government should refrain from such practices in future.

NPSSFW has already communicated its concerns and objections to Shri Piyush Goyel, Minister of Commerce & Industries, Government of India under Memo No. NPSSFW/Conv/19/22  dt.June 11, 2022.

Letter to MLA Eng. Cruz Silva: Stop Dredging of River Sal and No to any floating Jetty at Tarivaddo, Assolna

 

ASI letter dated April 27, 2021 to Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar

 

ASI Goa circle letter to Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar dated March 03, 2020

 

OLD GOA ILLEGAL BUNGALOW CHRONOLOGY

01/01/1968 - Gazette notification with regard to Protected Monument and Protected Area.

17/04/2015 – Application made before Deputy Collector by Govea Pinto for the correction of the survey plan as per the cadastral plan, wherein the area of the old structure is fraudulently shown as 397 sq. mts.

08/05/2015 - Two separate Deeds of Sale executed by Govea Pinto in favor of Mrs. Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar and Manish Munot.

14/07/2015 - Deputy Collector disposes the application filed by Jose Maria Govea Pinto directing the correction of the survey plan as per the cadastral plan, to 397 sq. mts.

07/09/2015 – Application by Govea Pinto to Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (CRZ) for repair of the structure

11/11/2015 – CRZ conducted site inspection but no measurements were taken.

28/12/2015 – CRZ granted permission/approval to Govea Pinto to reconstruct the existing structure as per the plan attached to his application. The CRZ notes that the area of the house is 397 sq. mts. and does not mention the height of the structure.

11/09/2015 – Govea Pinto approaches the Directorate of Archives and Archaeology, Goa for asking their NOC for repairs. They directed their letter to ASI, Goa.

28/10/2015 - Reply of ASI, Goa to Directorate of Archives and Archaeology, Goa. The said inspection report is enclosed with photographs showing the existing hut and stating that permission cannot be granted for the proposed construction which is entirely new as the same falls within the Protected Area.

13/01/2016 - Govea Pinto applies to TCP for reconstruction

28/03/2016 – TCP Conservative Committee carries out an inspection. The report is not made known. However, only the minutes of the 12th committee meeting are made known. The committee expresses their no objection from a conservation point of view and approves the project subject the applicant obtains the permission from NOC from to National Monument Authority (NMA) prior to commencement of any construction activity.

20/04/2016 – Town and Country planning does a site inspection without inviting the ASI member and wrongly report that the structure is beyond the protected area and proposed construction is located within 300 mts. from the protected monument.

21/06/2021 - Local ASI writes to Conservation Committee that he was not invited for the site inspection and advising that his office is well aware of the jurisdiction of the boundaries. He points out that the site falls within the protected area and NMA is not involved. Permission can only be granted by DG ASI and ask them to study the The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act (AMASR Act).

07/10/2016 - Chief Town planner writes to Deputy Town planner enclosing the letter of ASI and the minutes of the 12 th Conservation committee meeting. He tells the Deputy Town planner that the proposal stands approved subject to compliance of the conditions imposed by ASI.

18.10/2016 - Technical clearance order given by the Deputy Town planner. He disregards all conditions of ASI and grants reconstruction permission. He also mentions that the land use is preservation/conservation and not protected area.

Undated 2017-2018 - Govea Pinto writes to DG ASI seeking permission for repairs of existing house by submitting the approved TCP plan.

19/02/2018 – ASI writes to Govea Pinto stating that the plot is owned by Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar and seeking clarification why Govea Pinto is applying for permission in his name.

13/11/2018 - ASI Delhi forwards Govea application to local ASI

16/11/2018 - Local ASI produces a report with photographs of the existing hut. Photographs clearly show the hut is a ground floor structure made of traditional material.

03/02/ 2020 - Director monuments on behalf of DG ASI gives permission only for repairs not reconstruction and says that it has to be done with cooperation of local ASI. He mentions that the existing height and dimension be maintained.

11/02/2020 – ASI Goa writes to Suvarna Lotlikar that permission was granted only for repairs and permit his staff to visit the site and take photographs/ measurements before starting work or else submit the building plan which has been approved by DG ASI.

19/02/2020 - Suvarna Lotlikar points out that no building plans have been approved by DG ASI. She instead sends plan approved by TCP.

2020 - 12/3/2020, 16/03/2020, 23/3/2020 and 2/06/2020 – Letters by Local ASI to Suvarna Lotlikar demanding to stop work until the site inspection is convened.

August 2020 – writ petition filed against local ASi for harassment to Suvarna Lotlikar and violating orders of his Seniors of ASI Delhi.

22/09/2020 - Order against Local ASI scrapping his letters dated 12/3/2020, 16/03/2020, 23/3/2020 and 2/06/2020. It also pointed out that since the applicant had submitted TCP approved plans and other documents to DG ASI, it is presumed that DG ASI has granted permission in consonance with the TCP permissions.

April 2021 - Save Old Goa committee challenged this order through a Writ petition pointing out that Suvarna Lotlikar misrepresented information when applying for permission that ASI should be the final authority to grant permission and all state permission should be subsequent/ subordinate to the ASI permission. She had also misrepresented permission to the distant of the site to the court.

03/05/2021 – Judgment order given in favor of Suvarna Lotlikar stating that permission given by DG ASI has to be complied.

April 2021 – Suvarna Lotlikar files for contempt against local ASI.

03/05/2021 - Order asks the Local ASI not to interfere provided the follows the permission granted by DG ASI and plans approved by state authorities.

01/06/2021 - Came to notice that Director Monument - Delhi (ASI)  asked Goa ASI circle to take appropriate action by issuing a show cause notice immediately as per the provisions of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act. 1958 and Rules, 1959 against the applicant to carrying out illegal constructions within the premises of Centrally Protected Monument.

13/7/2021 - Vishal Volvoikar files application to revoke the illegal construction

08/09/2021 - Deeds of Sale executed by Mrs. Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar and Manish Munot in favour of Mr. Sumermal Jain.

01/10/2021 - Two separate Rectification Deeds executed between Govea Pinto, Mrs. Suvarna Suraj Lotlikar and Manish Munot.

25/11/2021 - Urfan Mulla files a complaint against illegal construction to Dy. Town Planner.

30/11/2021 - TCP issues Revocation Order in regards to fraudulent permission by state Department for an illegal construction

30/11/2021 - Panchayat issues Notice cum Stop Work Order as per resolution No. 3(2) dated 30.11.2021

02/12/2021 - TCP revokes Technical Clearance and requests Panchayat to initiate necessary action against the construction as provided under the village Panchayat Raj Act.

02/12/2021 - Panchayat issues Show Cause Notice

23/12/2021 - Police Complaint filed by Govea Pinto stating unknown person has committed forgery by  affixing his signature and thus an offence punishable under Sec. 465 IPC.

27/12/2021 - Revocation Order issued by Panchayat on the grounds of violating CRZ permissions, violating ASI permission etc.

10/02/ 2022 - Demolition Order issued by Panchayat against illegal construction

19/04/2022 - Intervention Application filed in Directorate of Panchayat by 3 groups (Concerned Citizens of Goa, Save Old Goa committee and Adv. Amit Palekar) related to preservation of identity, culture, history, environment and overall protection and welfare of State of Goa.