Heavy machinery movement was seen today at Kasarkod Beach in Honnavar today. Policeman is seen escorting the heavy vehicles meant to destroy Honnavar beach for sure. Local people at Kasarkod Beach are opposed to the Port project and their opposition in February 2025 was greeted with violent police reprisal on the villagers and arrests and detention for over 20 days at Darwad jail.
Wednesday, 10 December 2025
Heavy machinery movement at Honnavar on Kasarkod beach
Heavy machinery movement was seen today at Kasarkod Beach in Honnavar today. Policeman is seen escorting the heavy vehicles meant to destroy Honnavar beach for sure. Local people at Kasarkod Beach are opposed to the Port project and their opposition in February 2025 was greeted with violent police reprisal on the villagers and arrests and detention for over 20 days at Darwad jail.
Exact Flaws at Honnavar Port affairs at Kasarkod
To,
The Member Secretary
State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka
Room No. 706, 7TH Floor, 4th Gate, M.S Building,
Bangalore-560001, Karnataka
Email: msseiaakarnataka@gmail.com
7th October 2025
Sub: Representation pursuant to the Hon’ble Supreme Court order in Civil Appeal No. 11021/2025 dated 8th September 2025 on M/s Honnavar Port Pvt Ltd
Reference:
1. Representation dated 18th December 2024 to your office by ‘Karvali Menugarar Karmika Sanga’ & 3 others;
2. The Hon’ble Supreme Court order in Civil Appeal No. 11021/2025 dated 8th September 2025
Respected Sir,
It is respectfully submitted that on 8th September 2025, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal No. 11021/2025 (Karvali Menugarar Karmika Sanga v. SEIAA & Anr), was pleased to hold that “it is well open to the appellant to approach the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, as law so provides”, when hearing the claim of the Appellant that they have not been recognised as stakeholders and hence their grievances have not been heard, or factored in. A copy of the Hon’ble SC order is annexed as Annexure–1.
It is pertinent to state that, owing to the decision of your office to exempt the requirement of public hearing at the stage of issuance of the Terms of Reference (ToR) on 12th August 2024, the fisherfolk community has been denied its rightful opportunity to raise objections and concerns with respect to the proposed Honnavar Port. This denial was further compounded when a fresh public hearing was not conducted at the stage of issuance of the Environmental Clearance dated 31st December 2024.
It may be recalled that the affected fisherfolk along with civil society representatives had, by way of a representation dated 18th December 2024, already placed on record their specific concerns regarding the impacts of the port and its allied infrastructure. However, till date, no response has been received to the said representation. A copy of the 18th December 2024 representation is annexed as Annexure-2.
Be that as it may, and in continuation of our earlier submissions, and in compliance of the Order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court , we now seek to place before your office serious concerns and material discrepancies relating to the port project and its allied infrastructure, which directly affect the lives and livelihood of the Kasarkod fisherfolk community.
Misrepresentation of Kasarkod Fishing Port as ‘Fish Landing Centre’ in CZMP Map No. 25: It is submitted that the existing Kasarkod Fishing Port, situated in Kasarkod village on the left banks of the Sharavathi river, has been erroneously shown as a ‘Fish Landing Centre’ in the Coastal Zone Management Plan (CZMP) Map No. 25. A copy of CZMP Map No. 25 is annexed as Annexure-3.
In contrast, the small fish landing area at Honnavar side (on the right bank of Sharavathi river) has been incorrectly demarcated as a ‘Fishing Port’.
Information obtained under RTI confirms that, by Government Order No. AHF 51 SFS 2015, Bangalore, dated 15th September 2016, the Department of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, in exercise of its powers under Section 2(g) of the Karnataka Marine Fisheries (Regulation) Act, 1986, has formally declared Kasarkod Harbour, Honnavar, as a ‘Fishing Port’.
Furthermore, the Government Order dated 15th September 2016 clarifies that no ‘Fish Landing Centre’ exists in Honnavar Taluk. Therefore, the current CZMP demarcation is factually inaccurate and contrary to the official Government notification.
It is pertinent to highlight that the CZMP Maps for the State of Karnataka prepared under CRZ Notification 2019 suffers from various shortcomings. To name a few- misrepresentation of existing fishing infrastructure, non-demarcation of fisher folk houses and coastal commons, non-demarcation of Kasarkod as Turtle nesting beach, demarcation of Port Limits covering our properties without consultation, etc.
It is pertinent to highlight that as per Para 6 (vi) of the CRZ Notification, 2019 the State has the power to revisit the CZMP maps. The highlighted discrepancies is reason enough for such a revision.
A copy of the RTI response inclusive of Government Order No. AHF 51 SFS 2015, Bangalore, dated 15th September 2016 is annexed as Annexure-4.
The alignment and width of the proposed port connectivity road have undergone significant changes since the Public Hearing conducted on 27th January 2012: As per the EIA Report submitted in 2012 for obtaining Environmental Clearance, the connectivity road was proposed by expanding the existing single-lane road along the shoreline, running parallel to the coast for approximately 4 km from the project site through Kasarkod village up to National Highway-66, with a proposed width of 25 metres.
In contrast, the EIA Report submitted in 2024 now proposes an entirely different alignment. The connectivity road is planned parallel to the existing road but at an offset distance of about 100 metres, with a reduced total length of 2.58 km from NH-66 to the project site, and an increased width of 30 metres.
Further, a survey conducted in February 2025 was specifically intended to identify and demarcate households and community property within 35 metres from the High Water Mark that would be directly impacted by this revised alignment.
It is evident that there has been a substantial change in the material particulars relating to the alignment, length, and width of the port connectivity road passing through the sea shore of Kasarkod village. These alterations, introduced after the Public Hearing of 2012, constitute significant deviations that were never placed before the affected communities for consultation.
Survey of Fisherfolk Properties Impacted by 35m Wide Road Conducted in Secrecy (February 2025): It has come to light, through information obtained under the Right to Information Act from the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Karwar, that a survey of fisherfolk properties falling within 35 metres of the High Water Mark was completed on 26th February 2025 and the report on the same was circulated between various Government Department by 21st May 2025. However, this report has neither been made available to the Kasarkod Gram Panchayat nor shared with the fishing unions and affected fisherfolk whose properties and livelihoods stand to be directly impacted by the proposed port access road.
It is further submitted that the survey grossly underestimates the number of infrastructures and fishing-related sheds that will be lost due to the construction of the 35-metre-wide road. RTI response dated 1st August from Deputy Commissioner, Karwar is hereto marked and annexed as Annexure-5.
Omission of Kasarkod Village from the List of Impacted Fishing Villages in the EIA Report
It is submitted that the EIA Report (Chapter 3: Description of Environment, Table 3-35) lists 17 fishing villages along with details on the number of families, traditional fishermen families, BPL families, and fisherfolk population, purportedly sourced from the CMFRI Fishery Census Handbook 2016 for Karnataka State.
However, the details pertaining to Kasarkod village, where the proposed port project is located, have been entirely omitted in the report submitted by HPPL.
As per the CMFRI Fishery Census Handbook (2016), Kasarkod village comprises 752 fishermen families, including 719 traditional fishermen families, 696 BPL families, and a total fisherfolk population of 3,736.
It is further significant to highlight that Kasarkod village hosts the largest fisherfolk population in the entire Honnavar Taluk. The deliberate exclusion of this vital data renders the EIA report incomplete, misleading, and in violation of the requirement to present a true and comprehensive picture of the project’s social and livelihood impacts.
The report in its entirety can be accessed at the link below:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1V-GuQPbgU0jcjtgiSU651xxX5GJfB-i7?usp=sharing
Non-disclosure on Rehabilitation and Resettlement that it ought to arise from the road and rail connectivity: It is submitted that the proposed 2.58 km long road and 8.5 km railway network is aligned through the coastal village of Kasarkod which as per 2016 data is inhabited by 752 fisherfolk families and has a total population of 3,736 individuals. It is submitted that all these fisherfolk families in Kasarkod village were granted land by the Government of Karnataka in 1979 and were rehabilitated from flood affected village of Mallukurva. Since then, they have inhabiting on the same land and has been paying taxes and levies to the Government.
The EIA report submitted by HPPL fails to acknowledge the existence of such a huge fisherfolk population in the nearest vicinity of the project and makes no provision for their rehabilitation and resettlement.
In fact, Chapter 7 of the EIA report under Table 7-1: Public Hearing Action Plan, responding to a specific objection raised during the PH about the land acquisition, the proponent vehemently denies the requirement of private land acquisition and requirement of rehabilitation. Notably, the Project Engineer of the Project Proponent has himself publicly stated that 101 structures are falling on the 35 meter road being planned to be built along with the port, which indicates that there is need for rehabilitation.
Provision of Turtle Conservation Plan: The EIA Report refers to a Turtle Conservation Plan in Appendix Q, which has not been made available on the Parivesh Portal. Accordingly, it is requested if a copy of the said Turtle Conservation Plan can be shared with the undersigned.
In light of the above, it is respectfully submitted that the Honnavar Port project suffers from serious procedural lapses, misrepresentations, and material omissions that strike at the root of its validity under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), 2006 framework and the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 2019. The denial of public hearing, the misclassification of fishing infrastructure in the CZMP, the omission of Kasarkod village and its large fisherfolk population from the EIA, the non-disclosure of rehabilitation and resettlement obligations, and the secretive and inaccurate survey of properties cumulatively demonstrate a failure to uphold the principles of transparency, natural justice, and participatory decision-making mandated under law.
Given the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order dated 8th September 2025, affirming our right to approach this Authority, we humbly request that the SEIAA:
Reconsider and review the Environmental Clearance granted to M/s Honnavar Port Pvt Ltd on 31st December 2024, in light of the discrepancies and omissions detailed herein;
Direct a fresh and comprehensive assessment, including mandatory public hearing, with full participation of the fisherfolk of Kasarkod and other affected villages;
Ensure a transparent re-survey of properties and infrastructures affected by the proposed 35-metre-wide port access road, with prior notice to and participation of the Kasarkod Gram Panchayat and the fishing unions; and
Take all further steps necessary to safeguard the rights, livelihoods, and environment of the Kasarkod fisherfolk community.
We, the affected fisherfolk and their union, therefore pray that this Authority act in the spirit of fairness and legality to ensure that the Honnavar Port project does not proceed at the cost of our community’s survival and the fragile coastal ecology.
Respectfully,
Sd/-
(Rajesh Govind Tandel)
President, Karvali Menugarar Karmika Sanga
Copy marked to:
The Additional Chief Secretary
Government of Karnataka,
Forest, Ecology & Environment Department,
M.S.Building, Dr.Ambedkar Veedhi, Bangalore – 560 001
Email: prs-fee@karnataka.gov.in
Director of Ports & Member (Maritime & IWT Operations)
Directorate of Ports & IWT, Baithkol, Karwar
Email: directoratep@gmail.com
Directorate of Fisheries Government of Karnataka
3RD FLOOR, TOWER Dr, PODIUM BLOCK,
Vishweshwaraiah Rd, Ambedkar Veedhi, Vasanth Nagar,
Bengaluru, Karnataka 560001
Email: dfkamataka@rediffmail.com
Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
Uttar Kanada district, Karwar-581301
Email: dckarwar@gmail.com
Thursday, 27 February 2025
Letter to Karwar Deputy Commisioner on Police repression at Tonka and Keni in Uttar Kannada
From:
Sebastiao Rodrigues
General Secretary,
National Federation of Small-Scale Fishworkers (NFSF),
20/4, Sil Lane,
Kolkata - 700 015
Mobile: 9923336347
E-mail: inlandfisheries.india@gmail.com
Date: 27 February 2025
Ref. no. NFSF/GS/Kar-01/25
To,
K. Laxmipriya
Deputy Commisioner,
Karwar,
Uttar Kannada,
Karnataka,
India
Email: dckarwar@gmail.com
Phone: 9483511015, 9791099097, 9449589597
Subject: Police repression against fishing communities at Keni, Ankola on 24.02.2025 and at Kasarkod, Honnavar on 25.02.2025...Regarding.
Madam,
We are constrained to draw your attention to the following two media reports:
We are shocked to note that your office authorised Police action on small scale fishing communities on the coast of Keni village in Ankola Taluka and in Kasarkod village in Honnavar Taluka back to back on 24 and 25 February 2025.
We have got reports that fishing communities in both the localities are fiercely opposed to the proposed Port projects and your office is providing Police protections to protect Port developers.
We consider that it is of utmost urgency that coast is defended from such developments as it threatens not only fishing based livelihoods but also community identity as fishers. And we are already aware the irreversible damage faced by fishing communities due to Port installations in Karwar. We got to lessons from this rather than committing more such follies.
We have also received information that 45 fisher people of Kasarkod, Honnavar are criminally chared under as many as thirteen sections of BNS that attracts punishment extending to death sentence and life sentence. This is the reward State administration has bestowed upon these fishers for demonstrating their intention to protect the coast at Tonka, Kasargod that is Turtle Nesting site from permanent damage through Port project. Amongst those criminally charged includes 38 men and 07 women named in FIR registered against them at Honnavara Police station on 25.02.2025 with 0049/2025 as crime number.
What is shocking is that amongst those criminally charged includes also those who were not present to commit the offences they are supposed to have committed. The example of Ganapati Tandel and Renuka Ganapati Tandel is one of the glaring one as they were in transit from Mangalore to Bengaluru on 25.02.2025 evening flight.
The choice of names in FIR indicates malafide intention of mass criminalization of fishing communities to instill fear amongst fearless, courageous and dignified fishers of Kasarkod.
As we came to know through media reports that fishers have been in opposition to Port project for past four years it looks to be desperate attempt of State administration to tag these fishers as criminals once again. We are aware that this was attempted earlier too.
Times of India links we shared on this report has interesting conclusion that we wish to quote for you here "While the government views the port construction as a means to boost trade and commerce, fishermen fear loss of their livelihood." NFSF stands on the side of fishermen and express our total outrage againt all the intimidating tactics adopted against fishing communities both in Ankola and Honnavara coasts.
In Kasarkod 1000 Policemen were brought in to protect surveyors landside of the HTL while people gathered on the beach on inter-tidal space and water. Few Policemen were spotted without their name plates and buckle numbers on their uniforms. Additionally few Policemen covered their faces with black masks which was very suspicious act in itself as we noticed from the photos circulating on social media.
We got reports that police entered people's houses later in the evening and whisked away people to police vans to bebtaken into police custody.
We really want you to take through the labyrinths of criminality attributed to dignified fishermen and fisherwonen of Kasarkod. Here are the 13 sections of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023:
Section on fisherfolk at Tonka;
109; Attempt to murder. This attracts even life sentence.
115(2); Punishment for voluntarily causing
hurt. This attracts one year in Prison
121(1);Voluntarily causing hurt or grivious hirt to deter public servant from his duty. This has five year jail term
126(2); Wrongful restraint. This attracts one month imprisonment.
132; Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty. This attracts two years imprisonment.
189(2);Unlawful assembly- Being member of
unlawful assembly. This attracts six months jail term.
190;Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object.
191(2); Rioting- Punishment for rioting. Two years jail term.
351(3); Criminal intimidation punishment. This attracts jail sentence of seven years.
352; Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace. This attracts two years imprisonment.
49; Punishment of abetment if act abetted is committed in consequence and where no express provision is made
for its punishment.
61(2); Criminal conspiracy punishment. This attracts death sentence.
74; Assault or use of criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty. This attracts punishment of five years imprisonment.
And now we wish to reproduce names of fishers of Kasarkod recorded in FIR mentioned above. We start with seven women accused:
1. Parvati Datta Tandel
2. Recharge Rajesh Tandel
3. Bharati Rajesh Tandel
4. Renuka Ganapati Tandel
5. Vimala Kamalakar
6. Yashoda Devendra Tandel
7. Vishala Shantaram Tandel
And now 38 fishermen of Kasarkod accused:
1. Rajesh Govind Tandel
2. Hamja Patel
3. Raju Datta Tandel
4. Mahamad Koya Sab
5. Vivan Felison Fernandes
6. Rajesh Sheshagiri Tandel
7. Ayub Sab
8. Bhaskar Tandel
9. Ramesh Babu Tandel
10. Manjunath Devayya Tandel
11. Manoj Sheshagiri Tandel
12. Yasin Hamja Sab
13. Ganapati Tandel
14. Ramesh Manjunath Tandel
15. Manjunath Pandurang Tandel
16. Raghuvendra Prakash Tandel
17. Made Janna Tandel
18. Siyab Shaikh Kunji Sab
19. Rajesh Mohan Tandel
20. Mahammad Yahya Mohammad Sab Baba
21. Nagaraj Devappa Tandel
22. Basheer Ismail Patel
23. Mahammad Abdul Patel
24. Tamum Jameer Sab
25. Suleman G.H. Hassan
26. Siraj Hamjad Sab
27. Sachin Chandra Tandel
28. Sandeep Ramdas Tandel
29. Narasimha Nanda Tandel
30. Salman Khan Ismail Sab
31. Subray Damu Tandel
32. Harsha Pandurang Tandel
33. Kiran Ramchandra Mesta
34. Shantaram Manjunath Tandel
35. Vinay Krishna Tandel
36. Manjunath Tandel
37. Ashfaq Mahhamad Nellikum
38. Ramesh Manjunath Tandel
And the team that criminalized these fishers all have common address: Port office, Honnavar, R/o Sea Bird Road, Baithkol, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
The one signed as complainant is Sayinath Narayan Pednekar. And five names that appears in FIR includes Matesh Fernandes, Roshan Gunagi, Vivek Savant, Batte A.Y. and Vinayak Datta Naik.
Please convey our strongest outrage to the Karnataka administration that has unleashed Police terror though your office against fishing communities defending their lives and fishing based livelihoods.
We hereby call upon your office:
1. To stop harrarrasing and criminalizing fishing communities who live dignified life though their fishing based hard labour. Neither State nor Corporate has right to expell them from the coast.
2. To withdraw all the criminal cases filed against fishers on 25.02.2025 as mentioned above. We call upon your office to get the FIR quashed.
Fishers in Uttara Kannada deserve much better treatment than the way your office is perceiving them as criminals that are to be banished from the coast. This is indeed abuse of your office to launch something heineou against fishing communities who are first defence of our coasts. It is deeply regrettable to note the way your office is treating fishing communities in insulting manner.
Awaiting your quick and decisive response in defence of fishing communities.
Thanking you,
Yours Truly,
Sebastiao Rodrigues
General Secretary,
National Federation of Small-Scale Fishworkers (NFSF)
Copy to:
1. All concerned government authorities
2. Fishing communities on the coast of Uttara Kannada District.
Saturday, 29 June 2019
Press Statement in support of Rama Kankonkar and Arturo D’Souza
Thursday, 19 July 2018
Attack on Jose Oliviera at Merces
Tuesday, 17 July 2018
Second attack on Sonshi mining protester
Bharat Mukti Morcha, Goa Unit condemns second attack on
Surendra Sablo Gawde early morning today July 17, 2018 in Sonshi, Sattari, Goa
while on his way back home after night duty at work. He is leading protest
against mining industry and has filed several petitions in Courts in Goa. Two
men wearing black dresses with masks and with knives attacked him on Sonshi
internal road. He managed to escape without sustaining any injury leaving his
bike on the spot.Surendra Gawade and GAKUVED Federation had filed complaint on 12.07.2018 at the Valpoi police station, office of the SP and before the ST Commission about the threat call and first attack.
Surendra Gawade and the mining affected villagers had filed petitions in the High Court, Goa Human Rights Commission and Goa ST Commission against the mining companies earlier this year for various violations by the mining companies.
No action by the Goa police or concern authorities till date. No FIR has been registered so far. It appears that all authorities are hand in gloves to intimidate Surendra Gawade and the tribal villagers of Sonshi. This incident proves collapse of constitutional machinery in Goa and rule of Manusmriti enforced deliberately for bamon supremacy and capitalism aggression.
Monday, 16 July 2018
Acid attack on mining opponent in Honda, Sattari
Jai Mulnivasi!
Saturday, 12 August 2017
Traditional Fishermen under attack in Zuari, nets torn by marauding mini per seine boats
Sanjay Pereira's fishing nets were torn apart today morning. Fisheries department even though is aware of the habitual illegalities in Zuari sent their Patrol boat only at 11.00 am to the venue of illegalities when all the boats had gone away. It is not clear but certainly a matter of easy guess as to why Fisheries department is not ready to crack down on this illegal fishing.
Bharat Mukti Morcha condemns fresh violence in Zuari river and calls upon Department of Fisheries to station its patrol boat permanently in Zuari river so as to avoid these kinds of confrontations.
Friday, 21 November 2014
Race war against tribes in Goa over fishing in Zuari River
|
1
To,
The
Governor
Government
of Goa
Dona
Paula, Goa
|
2
To,
The
Chief Minister,
Government
of Goa
Secretariat,
Porvorim,
Goa
|
|
3
To,
The
Minister of Fisheries,
Government
of Goa,
Secretariat,
Porvorim,
Goa
|
4
To,
The
Chief Secretary,
Government
of Goa,
Secretariat,
Porvorim,
Goa
|
|
5
To,
The
Secretary (Fisheries)
Government
of Goa,
Secretariat,
Porvorim,
Goa
|
6
To,
The
Under Secretary (Fisheries),
Government
of Goa,
Secretariat,
Porvorim,
Goa
|
|
7
To,
The
Captain of Ports,
River
Navigation Department
Panjim,
Goa
|
8
To,
The
Director,
Department
of Tourism,
Panjim,
Goa
|
|
9
To,
The
Director,
Department
of Fisheries,
Government
of Goa,
Panjim,
Goa
|
10
To,
The
Collector (North Goa),
Government
of Goa
Panjim,
Goa
|
|
11
To,
The
Mamlatdar,
Tiswadi
Taluka,
Panjim,
Goa
|
12
To,
The
Director-General of Police (DGP)
Police
Headquarters,
Panjim,
Goa
|
|
13
To,
The
Superintendent of Police (North Goa)
Porvorim,
Goa
|
14
To,
Vishnu
Surya Wagh
The
Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA)
St.
Andre Constituency,
Goa
|
|
15
To,
The
Parish Priest,
Our
Lady of Bethlehem,
Bambolim
Goa
|
16
To
The
Sarpanch,
Village
Panchayat of Curca – Bambolim- Talaulim
Goa
|
|
17
To,
The
Sarpanch,
Village
Panchayat of Siridao
Goa
|
18
To,
The
Sarpanch,
Village
Panchayat of Taleigao,
Goa
|
|
19
To,
The
Sarpanch,
Village
Panchayat of Santa Cruz, Goa
|
20
To,
The
Parish Priest,
Our
Lady of Rosary Church,
Siridao,
Goa
|


