Please be informed about serious frauds
committed by Goa Archbishop and how Church bodies are manipulated to cover up
these frauds. The latest is the abuse of two Catholic Lay organizations engaged
in organizing United Goa Marathon: Run for Unity and Peace on November 14,
2015. Two organizations are Catholic Association of Goa (CAG) in collaboration
with All India Catholic Union (AICU). Because of the proxy Bamon control exercised
over both these organizations has refrained taking decisive steps against Goa
Archbishop’s frauds in Vanxim and instead has openly got entrapped into his
chain of greed. John the Baptist warned during his time. This is the warning of
our time. Both the organizations believe in idiom ‘See no evil at Paço Patriarchal,
Hear no evil at Paço Patriarchal, and speak no evil at Paço Patriarchal’.
Instead this run has Archbishop Felipe Neri Ferrao as its Chief Patron!
Bharat
Mukti Morcha is not against sports like marathon, nor against ideal of Peace
and Unity nor against Goa and Goans but certainly against every evil that flows
from Archbishops’s house in Panjim to promote exclusive interest of Bamon Raj.
It is this Archbishop Neri that is involved in top level Bamon Raj advocacy and
action. It is this Archbishop Neri who is responsible to manipulate public
opinion to collaborate with another Bamon Manohar Parrikar and got BJP in power
resulting in several attacks on Mulnivasi Christians. And after getting himself
promoted as Defense Minister of India continued his friendly collaborative
links with Goa Archbishop and now both of them have collaborated to take away
huge tract of land in Canaguinim-Naqueri-Betul Panchayat to get it as permanent
venue for Air shows.
We have no doubt that we need a marathon run for Justice
targeting Archbishop of Goa to expose all that is hidden including diversion of
wealth in Swiss accounts. They are both active votaries of Government the word
that has origin in two Latin words ‘Guverno’
that means ‘to control’ and ‘mentis’
that means ‘mind’. So mind control mechanism has a name called Government. And
who wants to control minds? Bamons. Whose minds that they want to control
‘Mulnivasis’ or ‘Shudras’ – a Sanskrit word for Slaves as per law of
Manusmriti. Currently Goa is packed with large number of mind control
mechanisms that projects Bamons on the top of the World to be obeyed by the
rest of the people.
Here we bring to your kind attention and
graceful reflection the way Archbishop Ferrao
effected the sale deed through then Attorney of Patriarch of East indies
Fr. Arlino de Mello on February 11, 2006. Sale deed is recorded at
sub-registrar’s office, located in Panjim that heralds new era of bold frauds
by Goa Archbishop now Patron of CAG organized and AICU collaborated Marathon
for Peace and Unity.
Civil
law fraud
What the Archbishop of Goa Felipe Neri Ferrao
held all along namely that his Sale of Vanxim island is legally correct but
morally wrong(even though Archbishop is supposed to uphold morals he admits his
own moral failures) has found to be a bluff. Evidence surfaced from section 13A
of the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 points towards Vanxim
sale being not only morally wrong but also legally wrong. This section was
inserted in the law by the Goa, Daman & Diu Agricultural Tenancy (Amendment)
Act, 1966. Section 13A has seven clauses and we reproduce it here in public
interest so that Goa Archbishop is asked by CAG members, AICU members, parishioners
from various parishes in the world, Catholic Bishops Conference of India
(CBCI), Federation of Asian Bishops (FABC) and the Vatican city officials
headed by Pope Francis. Fr.Francisco Caldeira too has given ill conceived, ill
informed public statements in a bid to confuse public.
Vanxim paddy fields belonged legally to Santa
Monica convent. Archbishop Ferrao effected the sale deed through then Attorney
of Patriarch of East indies Fr. Arlino de Mello on February 11, 2006. Sale deed is
recorded at sub-registrar’s office, located in Panjim.
It is worth noting that both parties: sellers
- the Archbishop Ferrao as well as the buyer Mahendra Gaunekar – are bamons and
this is not by co-incidence. This is where the seeds of injustice are sown by
Archbishop Neri and now sought to be covered up through marathon run for Peace
and Unity. It is here that Archbishop stood united for Bamons and caused body
blow to the Peace of munlivasi people who are Catholics and who are not.
The paddy fields are tenanted land with
nearly 60 tenants on it. We have already published as to how this sale deed has
violated Canon Law but will do it here again to refresh memory. Now in this
posting we are please to share text of section 13A of the Goa, Daman and Diu
Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 to expose how Goa Archbishop has indulged in
legal violations besides self admitted moral wrongs which should have prompted
him to exit but has not allowed him to do so.
Section
13A: Tenant’s right of first purchase: - (1) When a landlord intends to sell
any land cultivated by a tenant he shall give notice of his intention to the
tenant in the prescribed manner and shall specify the price at which the sale
is to take place and call upon him to state within 90 days of receipt of the
notice whether he is willing to buy the land at the price specified.
(2)
The tenant may within 90 days of receipt of the notice signify in the
prescribed manner his readiness to purchase the land at the price specified in
the notice and there upon a contract to purchase the land at the said price
shall be deemed to have been concluded between the landlord and the tenant.
(3)
If the tenant is willing to purchase the land but contends that the price
specified in the notice is excessive he may apply to the Collector in
prescribed manner within 30 days of receipt of notice under sub-section (1) for
determining the price whereupon the Collector shall determine the same in
prescribed manner in accordance with the principles laid down in the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 and the price so determined by the Collector shall be deemed to be the price
specific in the notice under sub-section (1). But the tenant shall in such an
event exercise the option conferred by sub-section (2) within 60 days the
receipt of notice of the price fixed by the Collector.
(4)
If the tenant fails within the period specified in sub-section (1) to signify
his acceptance as provided in sub-section (2), the landlord shall be free to
sell the land in question to any person at a price not lower than that set out
in the notice or the price determined by the Collector under sub-section (3) as
the case may be.
(5)
Any sale by a landlord to a person other than a tenant without giving the
notice required by sub-section (1), or before the expiry of the period of the
said notice or at price lower than, that set out in the notice or the price
determined by the Collector under sub-section (3) as t he case may be, shall be
void.
(6)
Notwithstanding anything in this section, tenant who fails to avail himself of
the offer of first purchase made under sub-section (1) shall not, by reason
thereof, cease to be a tenant, but shall continue as tenant under the new owner
on the same terms and conditions as before.
(7) Government
may, subject to due appropriation being made in this behalf, grant on such
terms as may be prescribed, a loan to a tenant for the purchase of any land in
respect of which a notice ha been served upon him under sub-section (1).
While the above is a complete section 13A
that has been violated by Goa Archbishop lets now take closer look at clauses
(1) and (5) that bear brazen violations. Santa Monica was legally bound to
serve the notice of sale stating the price. Lets look at the Clause (1) again here:
“(1)
When a landlord intends to sell any land cultivated by a tenant he shall give
notice of his intention to the tenant in the prescribed manner and shall
specify the price at which the sale is to take place and call upon him to state
within 90 days of receipt of the notice whether he is willing to buy the land
at the price specified.”
This clause was violated as Archbishop sold
Vanxim island in secrecy.
Then clause 5 of this section invalidates
such sales. It states “(5) Any sale by a
landlord to a person other than a tenant without giving the notice required by
sub-section (1), or before the expiry of the period of the said notice or at
price lower than, that set out in the notice or the price determined by the
Collector under sub-section (3) as the case may be, shall be void.”
Now because Archbishop sold Vanxim in secrecy
it is a legal fraud. He sold Vanxim and kept it without informing any one for
three years so that time bar for challenge in the court of law expires. This
led to around 60 cases in mamlatdar’s court, Deputy Collector’s Court,
Administrative Tribunal, Sessions Court, High Court resulting in people being
forced to spend on lawyers.
Goa Archbishop has violated this clause by
selling Vanxim paddy fields amounting to 4,85,275 square meters. On record
Archbishop has received total of Rs. 55,04,150/-. Records of sale claims land
sold at the rate of Rs.20/- per square meter. The actual amount at this rate
works out to be Rs. 97,05,500/-. In addition there are huge
financial underhand transactions in this deal between Bamons leading to
eviction of the local people living on island for past many centuries.
Mahendra Gaunekar then sold this land to
corporate – Ozone group from Chennai for Rs. 30 crores on record. Ozone group
plans to set up Golf course, Casinos, Gambling, Spa, Private marina, Luxury
villas etc after evicting all the local residents. Then the name of Vanxim
island is proposed to be changed into Ozone island. Prostitution is synonymous
with golf as in Philippines and Thailand. It is called ‘Sex tourism’. The
entire village is objecting and by no means will allow Ozone project to
materialize.
Canon
Law fraud
In addition to violation of civil law
relating to tenancy Archbishop has also violated Canon Law. Vita consecrata 82 urges members of
institutes of consecrated life “to
denounce the injustices committed against so many sons and daughters of God and
commit themselves to the promotion of justice.” Who will denounce
Archbishop bamon Felipe Neri Ferrao when he himself is involved in such as
massive scandal of Vanxim sale?
Today’s whisper will grow into roar of
tomorrow. It is just a matter of time that Bamon raj is torn asunder and
mulnivasis attain their liberation from bamon tyranny. Now is the time for
mulnivasi catholic priests to rise up against all the Bamani evils taking place
all over Goa and rest of India.
Now lets put Vanxim sale to the test of
provisions of Canon Law that governs the affairs of the Church. According
to Canon law 1291 “the permission of the
authority competent according to the norm of law is required for the valid
alienation of goods which constitute by legitimate designation the stable
patrimony of a public juridic person and whose value exceeds the sum defined by
law.”
Alienation means transfer of ownership
through any of the three means sale, gift, or exchange. In case of Vanxim sale
as a method that is used to transfer ownership to Bamon Mahendra Gaunekar by
Archbishop Bamon Felipe Felipe Neri Ferrao. He has not declared in public as to
whose permission has he taken before effecting sale deed in February 2006
neither has he disclosed the value of the sold land in Vanxim. Was it 20 rupees
or 6 rupees per square meter?
Next canon 1292 dealing with alienation has
four parts: “(1) Without prejudice to the
prescript of can. 638 (3), when the value of the goods whose alienation is
proposed falls within the minimum and maximum amounts to be defined by the
conference of bishops for its own region, the competent authority is determined
by the statutes of juridic persons if they are not subject to the diocesan
bishop; otherwise, the competent authority is the diocesan bishop with the
consent of the financial council, the college of consultors, and those
concerned. The diocesan bishop himself also needs their consent to alienate the
goods of the diocese.
(2)
The permission of the Holy See is also required for the valid alienation of
goods whose value exceeds the maximum amount, goods given to the Church by vow,
or goods precious for artistic or historical reasons.
(3)
If the assets to be alienated is divisible, the parts already alienated must be
mentioned when seeking permission for the alienation; otherwise the permission
is invalid.
(4)
Those who by advice or consent must take part in alienating goods are not to
offer advice or consent unless they have first been thoroughly informed both of
the economic state of the juridic person whose goods are proposed for
alienation and of previous alienations.”
It is crystal clear from the Canon Law 1924
(4) that the prior advice, thorough information and consent of Vanxim people
were necessary before affecting the sale deed of Vanxim land in February 2006.
Archbishop is guilty of violating Canon law in this case.
Another fact comes to the fore that the
crucial and most vital decision of minimum and maximum amount of land to be
sold is taken by Catholic Bishop’s Conference of India (CBCI). What are the
limits set? Who has this information? Why Archbishop has not made this
information public?
Who are members of financial council and
college of consultors that gave consent to Archbishop to sell Vanxim
land? Why as per Canon 1292 (1) Vanxim people were not consulted before the
sale deed even though their rights are to be affected in the circumstances after
this sale deed. This violation of Canon law points towards direct involvement
of Archbishop Felipe Neri Ferrao in Bamani conspiracy against mulnivasis.
“Canon 1293 (1) The alienation of goods whose value exceeds the defined minimum amount
also requires the following:
1.
A just cause, such as urgent necessity, evident advantage, piety, charity, or
some other grave pastoral reason;
2.
A written appraisal by experts of the asset to be alienated.
(2)
Other precautions prescribed by legitimate authority are also to be observed to
avoid harm to the church.
Canon
1294 (1) An asset ordinarily must not be alienated for a price less than that
indicated in the appraisal.
(2)
The money received from the alienation is either to be invested carefully for the
advantage of the Church or to be expended prudently according to the purposes
of alienation.”
What was a just cause that warranted
sale of Vanxim? What was the urgent necessity that led to sale of Vanxim? What
was the evident advantage that prompted sale of Vanxim? What was the
consideration of piety that led to selling of Vanxim? What was charity that
prompted sale of Vanxim? What was the other grave pastoral reason that led to
sale of Vanxim? The official statement by Fr. Fransisco Caldeira reasons that
the Vanxim was sold to provide for maintenance of Santa Monica convent does not
fit the criteria of canon law 1293. It is not a just cause because sale of
Vanxim caused injustice on people of Vanxim. There was no evident advantage,
not even financial advantage when it was sold for Rs.6/- to Rs. 20/- per square
meters when market rate at that time was 1000 times more. So Vanxim was sold
with evident disadvantage to the diocese. Why CAG and AICU silent on this
issue? Is it because they are not interested in solving this?
Who were the experts of Bishop that gave
written appraisal advocating sale of Vanxim? How many experts were appointed on
this task? Why their reports are not made public? Why their names are not made
public? What was the role of Fr.Consecao D’silva, the current Taleigao Parish
Priest in all this? Why Archbishop is operating in secrecy about Vanxim on
violations of Canon law? Did these experts write a grossly underestimated
report?
What was the amount arrived rent at in
appraisal report of experts? When these written reports of experts are going to
be made public?
As per canon 1294 (1) land cannot be
ordinarily sold. It is the duty of the Church to make sure that it is not going
to be used for unethical purposes such as golf tourism, casinos, sex tourism,
etc. In Vanxim case entire process of sale itself is case of fraudulency in
total violation of canon law.
Vanxim sale of church land by Archbishop
bamon Felipe Neri Ferrao to another Bamon Mahendra Gaunekar is completely
unethical, marred with corruption and part of wider bamani conspiracy to make
mulnivasi people of Goa captives of bamon raj. There is no ground left to be
turned in where puss of corruption and Bamanism does not flow smoothly in the
case of Vanxim sale. Considering Vanxim experience none of other projects
undertaken by Archbishop Bamon Felipe Neri Ferrao cannot be ruled out for being
done in the interest of Bamanism and against the interest of mulnivasis.
Now the question arises as to whether Pontiff
is aware of Bamanism in Goa and India. It is not certain as to what information
he has. But it is certain that Apostolic Nuncio to India, His Excellency, the
most reverend Archbishop Salvatore Pennacchio who visited Goa on 3rd
December 2011 to celebrate feast mass in Old Goa and then few months ago for
the exposition of St.Francis Xavier relics, is very well aware of caste
discriminations in India. He was present at the South Asian Symposium on
Church’s Social Doctrine in Honour of Blessed Pope John Paul II organized
jointly by FABC’ office of Human Development and CBCI’ Commission for Theology
and Doctrine that took place at St. Pius College, Goregaon, Mumbai on 14 to 16
October 2011. At this symposium Research Scholar (Law) B.M.Leela Kumari from
Aacharya Nagarjuna University made a written submission on caste
discriminations in India titled ‘the question of Dalit women today and church’s
response.’ The paper includes reference of bamani doctrine of manusmriti as
well as to the speeches of Dr. B.R.Ambedkar. This is included in a published
report of this symposium edited by Bishop Agnelo Gracias and Fr. Stephan
Fernandes. It is for him (Apostolic Nuncio, His Excellency, the Most Reverend
Archbishop Salvatore Pennacchio) who was a main celebrant of both the morning
prayers as well Holy Mass at Goregaon symposium to take the message of Bamanism
practices by Goa Archbishop to the Pontiff for greater common good of mulnivasi
Christians in India. And it is our duty to bring this message to you for
discussion on the table. Suppressing will not longer help.
Biblical call to drive out evil doers.
Now let us deal with the issue of what is to
be done with this Archbishop Bamon Felipe Neri Ferrao in Goa. The solution lies
in 1 Corinthians 5:9-13 “In my last
letter I instructed you not to associate with immoral people. I did not mean,
of course, those who do not belong to the Church and who are immoral, greedy,
embezzlers or worshippers of idols. Otherwise you would have to leave this
world. What I really meant was to avoid and not to mingle with those who,
calling themselves brothers, become immoral, greedy, or idolators, gossipers,
drunkards, or embezzlers. In which case you should not even eat with them. It
is no concern of mine to judge outsiders. But you, are you not to judge those
who are inside? Let God judge those outside, but as for you, drive out the
evil-doer from among you.”
Archbishop Bamon Felipe Neri Ferrao has not
only violated Canon Law but also civil law by selling Vanxim without giving
thorough information prior to the sale deed, and seeking their advice and
consent for sale but sold this island with underestimated written appraisals
that he has kept secret till date. Vanxim island was sold for a song and there
is not an iota of doubt in the air that Archbishop is involved in massive
embezzlement and black money. Otherwise Vanxim sale at the rate of Rs.6/- to
Rs.20/- is unexplainable. All these acts of Archbishop are evil acts and
through his hard work he has qualified himself as evil-doer. Now it is for all
the mulnivasi Christians in Goa and other parts of India to reward him as per 1corinthians 5:9-13; do not mingle with him, do not eat with him and drive him
away.
This flows from the writings of St. Paul
himself. It is therefore becomes duty of Christians to make sure that they do
not mingle with Archbishop Bamon Felipe Neri Ferrao, Share any food at lunch,
dinner and breakfast with him, and if he is around drive him away, for this is
a well deserved reward that he has earned through sale of Vanxim in violation
of Canon Law as well as Civil law.
Bharat Mukti Morcha will continue its Vanxim
marathon for Justice started in 2010. You are welcomed to join. Start with sharing
of this posting. And keep posting to your contacts. For currently Archbishop’s
house is an important centre of flow of injustice, strife and divisiveness,
faster we run in the Marathon sooner Goa will b free from
Bamon Raj. This is a marathon for Justice we must run.
Jai Bharat! Jai Mulnivasi! Jai Goa!
